Page 320 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 320

CHAPTER


                  The dawn of automated

                  insulin delivery: from                             16

                  promise to product



                                                            1
                                            Laura M. Nally, MD , Jennifer L. Sherr, MD, PhD 2
                  1 Associate Professor, Pediatric Endocrinology, Yale Children’s Diabetes Program, Yale University
                                                        2
                    School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Instructor, Pediatric Endocrinology, Yale
                  Children’s Diabetes Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States

                  Introduction

                  Although the discovery of insulin nearly a century ago allowed those diagnosed with
                  type 1 diabetes (T1D) to live with this chronic medical condition, intensive insulin
                  therapy proven in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the
                  follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications to stave off long-term compli-
                  cations does not come without a price [1,2]. Meticulous self-care in the form of
                  frequent glucose monitoring and adjustment of insulin regimen, while accounting
                  for a multitude of factors, including food, physical activity, stress, and sickness,
                  can be overwhelming [3,4]. Yet, recent technological advancements in the form of
                  continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps and continuous glucose
                  monitors (CGM) have made it possible to provide more physiologic insulin delivery.
                  The ultimate goal is to attain physiologically normal glucose levels, thus preventing
                  short- and long-term complications. To achieve restoration of normal function, a
                  combination of therapies will likely be required, composed of both immune modu-
                  lators as well as b-cell regeneration therapies.
                     Although cellular therapies are developed, a “mechanical cure” may allow
                  persons with diabetes to achieve targeted glycemia while minimizing the burden
                  placed on both themselves and, in many cases, their families. A mechanical cure
                  would ideally be composed of a fully closed-loop insulin delivery system; however,
                  given the pharmacokinetic properties of currently available rapid-acting insulin
                  analogs, to date, the focus has been placed on hybrid closed-loop systems.
                     The concept of a closed-loop system was first realized by Kadish and colleagues
                  in 1964. That early system incorporated continuous real-time intravenous glucose
                  readings to adjust intravenous (IV) infusions of insulin, glucose and/or glucagon
                  [5]. Yet, the determination for adjustments of these substrates was made by a
                  clinician monitoring the system constantly, making the practical application of the
                  system nearly impossible. A decade later, the Biostator was introduced, automating
                  the process. An algorithm on a microcomputer used real-time whole blood analyses
                  of glucose levels to automate insulin delivery [6]. However, this system could not be

                  Glucose Monitoring Devices. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816714-4.00016-8  327
                  Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325