Page 140 - Green Building Through Integrated Design
P. 140

WHO BENEFITS  117



                      Political


                      Political benefits might be seen as a subset of marketing and public relations bene-
                      fits, but I’d like green builders to consider them as separate, both for a local political
                      body, as well as for developers relying on public approval for acquiring development
                      entitlements and even design approval and building permits for specific projects. On
                      Earth Day 2008, I saw a spate of political announcements taking place at green build-
                      ings, where mayors and various public officials took advantage of the day to pro-
                      nounce their support for green buildings. In Los  Angeles, for example, Mayor
                      Antonio Villaraigosa announced the LEED Gold certification of the Luma condo-
                      miniums in the downtown area.* The project expects to save 30 percent of energy
                      compared with a traditional building and is part of a major new high-rise housing
                      development just south of downtown Los Angeles, for which all the buildings will be
                      LEED Gold certified.


                      Who Benefits?


                      One of the biggest issues in green buildings is that the benefits are unequally distrib-
                      uted between those who pay for the project and those who benefit. For example, the
                      benefits of green schools accrue most directly to the students, but it’s the school dis-
                      trict (and the taxpayers) who incur the cost. One can argue that the school district
                      should look favorably toward green buildings that benefit students and teachers pri-
                      marily, but that’s not always the case—districts are just as concerned about initial costs
                      and the effect of green buildings on their stretched capital budgets as are developers.
                        In speculative commercial development, the tenants receive most of the benefits of
                      reduced operating costs and higher productivity, but the developer must bear the ini-
                      tial cost increase. The recent studies cited earlier in this chapter show greater occu-
                      pancy and higher rents in commercial ENERGY STAR–certified office buildings, as
                      well as higher resale values are compelling, but many developers are concerned
                      whether these benefits will accrue to them. In retail development, for example, shop-
                      ping center developers in 2008 still do not expect higher rents for LEED-certified
                      retail projects, even though they might enjoy faster political approval and greater mar-
                                                       †
                      keting and public relations benefits. Nonetheless, major retail developers are
                      announcing LEED project commitments with regularity in 2008, leading one to pre-
                      sume that they see commercial benefits in such activity. ‡
                        Table 6.2 shows the distribution of green building benefits; when promoting green
                      buildings to various stakeholders, you should always consider these distinctions in
                      presenting the case for green buildings. Public policy for green buildings should take


                      *http://mayor.lacity.org/villaraigosaplan/EnergyandEnvironment/Greenbuilding/index.htm, accessed April 2008.
                      † Personal communication, Scott Wilson, vice president, construction, Regency Centers, September 2007.
                      ‡ Vestar Earth Day 2008 announcement; Regency Centers November 1, 2007 announcement.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145