Page 284 - Green Building Through Integrated Design

260 INDEX

schematic design phase. See conceptual and Tahoe Center for Environmental Sciences,
schematic design phases 221, 223–224
schools, 117 tax benefits and incentives, 105–106
Science & Technology Facility, 135 teams, design
Sculpture Building & Gallery, 3–5, 56–58 commitment to project, 212
Shambach, Robin, 61 experience, 123–124
Shangri La Botanical Gardens & Nature structure of, 124–125
Center, 140 temperatures, effect of natural ventilation on,
Shemwell, Robert, 71, 76 209f
Shroll, Tamara, 182 tenants. See occupancy
sick building syndrome, 38 Times Square, 237f
Sidwell Friends School, 136 timing, project, 128
Signature Centre, 29, 101f Toronto and Region Conservation Restoration
Simon, Clara, 91 Services Centre, 56
Simpson, Stuart, 93 Treadway, Douglas, 9–10, 99
site evaluation, 175–180 Triple Bottom Line concept, 146, 147t,
site questions 168–173
conceptual and schematic design phases, Turner Construction Company, 237
189–191 2003 California cost study, 134
design development phase, 204 2004 General Services Administration (GSA)
site selection, 175–180 cost study, 134–135
site water management questions, 190–191
size, project, 129 underfloor air distribution systems (UFADs),
sketches, 7–8 101–102
soft costs University of Calgary, 141–142
defined, 121 University of California, 190
energy and atmosphere credits, 155t–156t University of Pennsylvania, 70f, 71–77, 98,
indoor environmental quality credits, 176
157t, 159t University of Washington, 92f
overview, 138–139 Urick, Ken, 236f
sustainable site credits, 150t–151t U.S. Department of Energy, 135
water efficiency credits, 152t–153t User Effective Buildings approach, 39
solar electric systems, 155–156
“Spirit” rating systems, 20 Van der Linden, Ted, 63, 163, 234
SSRCx Facilities Commissioning, 236f Vento Residences, 130
“stack effect” approach, 132 Verdesian building, 225–226
stakeholder relations, 110 views, 158
Standard Refrigeration Company, 90 Villaraigosa, Antonio, 117
starchitects, 47, 126 Vision-SWOT-Action process, 70f
Stoller, Paul, 198, 206, 238
StopWaste.org project, 215 water efficiency credits, 151–154
stormwater design, 149–150 water use reduction, 152–154
Straus, Steve, 51 water-efficient landscaping, 151–152
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats water-related questions
(SWOT) analysis, 69–71 conceptual and schematic design phases,
sustainable design, 167, 173–175 192–193
sustainable site credits, 149–151 construction documents phase,
Sweetwater Creek State Park Visitor Center, 228–229
216–217 design development phase, 205–206
SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, Watts, Craig, 211
threats) analysis, 69–71 Weeks, Ben, 39, 96, 100