Page 258 - Grow from Within Mastering Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation
P. 258

Appendix B     243


              aration in the first place. Hans Brechbühl of the Tuck School of
              Business noted in 2006 that typical problems for new business
              concepts include different performance metrics, different cost
              structures, and cannibalization of existing products, which
              presents problems when the new concept is sold through exist-
              ing sales forces. The IBM PC group, for instance, broke a sacro-
              sanct IBM tradition by selling through retailers rather than
              exclusively through IBM’s vaunted sales organization. Saturn
              eschewed GM’s product development processes and, most vis-
              ibly to the public, its dealership sales practices.
                 To this day, a great deal of research suggests that using a sep-
              arate organization is typically the most effective way for a large
              company to develop innovations and bring them to market in
              situations where the capabilities necessary for the innovation
              to succeed are significantly different from the company’s capa-
              bilities, its dominant processes, or its core values. When a des-
              ignated group is assigned this task on an ongoing basis,
              however, the separation can make it difficult for the company
              to recognize and exploit the opportunities. Xerox’s failure to
              capitalize on numerous revolutionary innovations from its Palo
              Alto Research Center is one of the most poignant examples.
              PARC invented or incubated laser printing, Ethernet, the mod-
              ern personal computer graphical user interface of windows
              and icons, and the modern computer text editor, among many
              other things. Other companies, most famously 3Com and
              Apple Computer, garnered the lion’s share of profit from suc-
              cessfully commercializing these inventions. But Xerox was cer-
              tainly not the only company to underestimate the value of
              emerging computation technologies. Hewlett-Packard lost the
              first-mover advantage in this space as well. Steven Wozniak
              presented his idea for a microcomputer to his Hewlett-Packard
              bosses in 1975, but they declined to do anything with it, so he
              left and started Apple with Steven Jobs.
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263