Page 259 - Grow from Within Mastering Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation
P. 259

244   Appendix B


                 Over time, many companies came to the conclusion that their
              corporate laboratories and separated new business groups were
              not sufficiently successful in developing opportunities that their
              business units could or would pursue. Dedicated, protected
              new business development teams often operated more like
              enhanced, privileged versions of centralized R&D than like
              truly alternative corporate entrepreneurial groups. In the
              extreme, conglomerate pioneer Harold Geneen of ITT wrote in
              1984 in his book Managing that “entrepreneurism [sic] is the
              very antithesis of large corporations.” Some companies spun
              out their corporate labs as independent contract research com-
              panies that would continue to do business with the original par-
              ent company but could also pursue other opportunities if
              sufficient internal interest could not be generated.
                 Rather than set up a separate new business development
              organization, other companies tried to reinvigorate their inter-
              nal conceptualization and commercialization prowess by emu-
              lating the practices and culture of an acknowledged leader. For
              instance, 3M was famous in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s for con-
              sistently introducing new businesses built around innovative
              technology platforms.  A look inside the 3M organization
              revealed two particular factors that accounted for its ability to
              repeatedly generate new businesses: 3M allowed its engineers
              and scientists to (1) spend up to 15 percent of their time on proj-
              ects of their own design, and (2) seek resources and mentoring
              from anywhere in the company, should an individual’s imme-
              diate supervisors reject requests for support. Joe Bailey, a VP of
              R&D in 1999, noted in 3M’s 2002 self-published history, A Cen-
              tury of Innovation, that “the most successful people at 3M were
              good at getting out of their offices, meeting people, interacting
              and knowing where to find the expertise they needed.” Teams
              could form flexibly around new business concepts, and, if these
              concepts were successful, the individuals involved might take
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264