Page 33 - Grow from Within Mastering Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation
P. 33

20    grow from within


              ingly depended on the application of science and technology.
              Germany introduced the corporate research and development
              (R&D) laboratory in the late 1800s. By the early twentieth cen-
              tury, thousands of U.S. and European companies had set up
              centralized R&D labs to drive innovation. During World War
              II, large companies worked in partnership with government
              laboratories and universities. On August 6, 1945, 16 hours after
              the atomic attack on Hiroshima, Japan, President Harry S. Tru-
              man made a public statement: “We have now won the battle of
              the laboratories. . . . What has been done is the greatest achieve-
              ment of organized science in history.”
                 Vannevar Bush captured the mood of the time in his 1945
              report, Science: The Endless Frontier. The report promoted what
              came to be known as the “linear model” of development, the
              idea that investment in high-quality science would provide a
              foundation for new technologies that could be turned into a
              cornucopia of profitable products. But by the 1970s, many com-
              panies had discovered that having the best science was insuf-
              ficient. They needed better ways to create viable opportunities
              based on what they were learning in their labs, and better ways
              to realize economic value.
                 Some companies created separate organizations dedicated to
              finding and developing opportunities that did not fit, or even
              conflicted, with the products of existing divisions or that were
              too long term for business units to pursue. However, protected
              new business development teams often operated more like
              enhanced, privileged versions of centralized R&D than like
              truly alternative corporate innovation groups. Other companies
              tried to emulate the flexible practices and culture of acknowl-
              edged leaders such as 3M, but these attempts often failed, as
              entrenched incentives and processes thwarted such flexibility.
                 By the 1980s, the competitive threat from Japanese and other
              Asian manufacturers led many Western companies to scale
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38