Page 90 - Aamir Rehman Gulf Capital and Islamic Finance The Rise of the New Global Players
P. 90

74                                       PART I  Background and Context

        financial return, these conglomerates often buy into assets and portfo-
        lio companies that have some strategic fit with the conglomerate’s
        existing businesses. In this regard, they differ significantly from
        returns-focused principal investment vehicles and private equity
        funds, which look solely for investments that are strong in their own
        right, as they have no intention of coordinating the activities of their
        portfolio companies.
             Take, for example, the case of the Kharafi Group of Kuwait.
        Established in 1976 as a mechanical and electrical works, it has
        expanded into a conglomerate of industrial companies, including
        construction, development, and infrastructure-related industries. The
                                                                     38
        group also holds a major stake in the National Bank of Kuwait. One
        strategic sector in which it has invested significantly is telecommuni-
        cations. Kharafi, through its investment vehicle Al Khair, has taken a
        30 percent stake in the Iraqi telecom provider Atheer and is also a sig-
        nificant owner of Zain telecom. Zain has expanded significantly
        beyond Kuwait, operating in Saudi Arabia and other Middle East
        markets and potentially evolving into a pan-regional telecom opera-
        tor. 39  Whereas an investor who was driven solely by absolute return
        objectives might build a more scattered portfolio of holdings, Kharafi
        has adopted a focus on key infrastructure sectors in which it has both
        operational and investment expertise.


        Increasing Institutionalization
        A major trend among private-sector investors in the region is
        increased institutionalization. Historically, portfolios and assets were
        typically held in individual names and financed through personal
        bank accounts. Family members and friends would invest together in
        assets, but they generally did so informally and kept their holdings in
        the personal names of consortium participants. This informal method
        of investment suited the overall economic environment in which the
        leaders of merchant families were establishing and growing fortunes.
        At that stage of development, more attention was paid to building
        business enterprises than to managing assets and investments.
             Over the past decade, however, far greater focus has been placed
        on developing institutional processes for managing wealth and mak-
        ing investment decisions. One reason for this has been that the scale of
        fortunes has increased to the point that professional management, cus-
        tomarily made up of nonfamily members, is appropriate considering
        the sums being invested. Another reason is that decades of interaction
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95