Page 249 - Geology and Geochemistry of Oil and Gas
P. 249

216                      MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN PETROLEUM GEOLOGY

           or in terms of relative thicknesses,

                     o     o    o  o   o      o   1=2
               l ¼ ½ðh þ ah þ bh Þðh þ h =a þ h =bފ                        (11.11)
                                              3
                     1
                           2
                                   1
                                3
                                       2
                                     o
                 o
           where h ¼ h i =  P  h i and the h is the relative frequency of a layer having the per-
                 i                   i
           meability k i .
             The last two equations show that the anisotropy coefficient is dependent on the
           ratio of strata with a given thickness to the total thickness and on the empirical
           factors. Inasmuch as the anisotropy coefficient is dimensionless, it is dependent on
           the ratios of permeabilities and not on the permeability themselves.
             The empirical factors a and b are constant for each particular formation or
           a group of similar formations as a whole. For example, on assuming that
           k 1ave ¼ 61 mD, k 2ave ¼ 5 mD, and k 3ave ¼ 0:5 mD, a ¼ 0:082 and b ¼ 0:0082, the
           values of k i (i ¼ 1; 2; 3) and a and b average out the theoretical values of l. Meas-
           urements of l, however, show that theoretically the thicknesses of the layer bands
           have the major effect. Therefore, if only the h i for each stratigrafic–lithologic section
           is known, one can calculate the anisotropy coefficients from Eq. 11.10 or 11.11.
             This conclusion can be extended to multicomponent and multilayer media, as
           shown by the following formulas:
                     o
                           o
                                                  o
                                              o
                                                                    o
                                                        o
                                o
                                          o
               l ¼ ½ðh þ ah þ bh þ       þ oh Þðh þ h =a þ h =b þ       þ h =oފ 1=2  (11.12)
                     1     2    3         n   1   2     3           n
           or
                                     1=2
                     n       n
                   "                #
                    X     o  X  o
               l ¼     ðah Þ  ðh =a i Þ                                    (11.12a)
                          i     i
                    i¼1     i¼1
             The median and the geometric-mean permeability is also used sometimes. From
           Eq. 11.7, for a three-component multilayer medium, the geometric-mean permea-
           bility (k geom ) is equal to
               k geom ¼ ðk k k ? Þ 1=2  ¼ k 1 ½ðh 1 þ ah 2 þ bh 3 Þ=ðh 1 þ h 2 =a þ h 3 =bފ 1=2  (11.13)
           or in terms of relative thicknesses,
                           o    o    o   o    o     o   1=2
               k geom ¼ k 1 ½ðh þ ah þ bh Þ=ðh þ h =a þ h =bފ              (11.14)
                                         1
                                              2
                                     3
                                                    3
                           1
                                2
             The geometric-mean permeability differs from the anisotropy coefficient in being
           dependent not only on the relative proportions of various strata and the empirical
           coefficients, but also on the mean permeability (the base permeability). Thus, k geom
           retains the dimensions of permeability.
             In the case of a multicomponent multilayer medium, k geom is equal to
                                               1=2
                          "       ,           #
                            n         n
                           X     o   X    o
                              ða i h Þ  ðh =a i Þ                           (11.15)
               k geom ¼ k ave
                                 i        i
                           i¼1        i¼1
                                                                     o
           where k ave is the average (mean) permeability of the reservoir. The h in Eqs. 11.12,
                                                                     i
           11.12a, and 11.15 is the relative frequency of any empirical factor.
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254