Page 564 - Handbook Of Integral Equations
P. 564

representation of the solution of the nonhomogeneous integral equation via the resolvent of the
               original equation is more convenient. To obtain the desired representation, we note that formula (3)
               can be transformed to the expression

                                                                    K(u)
                                    Y(u)=[1 – R(u)]F(u),   R(u)=         .                  (5)
                                                                  1+ K(u)
               On the basis of (5), by applying the Fourier inversion formula and the convolution theorem (for
               transforms) we obtain

                                                          ∞
                                                    1
                                       y(x)= f(x) – √      R(x – t)f(t) dt,                 (6)
                                                    2π  –∞
               where the resolvent R(x – t) of the integral equation (1) is given by the relation

                                                1    ∞   K(u)   –iux
                                        R(x)= √                e   du,                      (7)
                                                2π  –∞  1+ K(u)
               Thus, to determine the solution of the original integral equation (1), it suffices to find the func-
               tion R(x) by formula (7).
                   The function R(x) is a solution of Eq. (1) for a special form of the function f(x). Indeed, it
               follows from formulas (3) and (5) that for Y(u)= R(u) the function F(u) is equal to K(u). This
               means that, for f(x) ≡ K(x), the function y(x) ≡ R(x) is a solution of Eq. (1), i.e., the resolvent of
               Eq. (1) satisfies the integral equation

                                      1    ∞
                              R(x)+ √        K(x – t)R(t) dt = K(x),  –∞ < x < ∞.           (8)
                                      2π  –∞
               Note that to calculate direct and inverse Fourier transforms, one can use the corresponding tables
               from Supplements 6 and 7 and the books by H. Bateman and A. Erd´ elyi (1954) and by V. A. Ditkin
               and A. P. Prudnikov (1965).
                   Example. Let us solve the integral equation

                                          ∞

                                   y(x) – λ  exp α|x – t| y(t) dt = f(x),  –∞ < x < ∞,      (9)
                                         –∞
               which is a special case of Eq. (1) with kernel K(x – t) given by the expression
                                                  √
                                            K(x)= – 2πλe –α|x| ,  α >0.                    (10)
               Let us find the function R(x). To this end, we calculate the integral

                                                 ∞              2αλ
                                                       e
                                         K(u)= –  λe –α|x| iux  dx = –  2  2  .            (11)
                                                –∞             u + α
               In this case, formula (5) implies
                                                 K(u)       2αλ
                                          R(u)=        = –         ,                       (12)
                                                              2
                                                          2
                                                1+ K(u)  u + α – 2αλ
               and hence

                                     1    ∞               2  ∞     αλ

                               R(x)= √     R(u)e –iux  du = –            e –iux  du.       (13)
                                                                   2
                                                                2
                                     2π  –∞              π  –∞ u + α – 2αλ
               Assume that λ <  1 2  α. In this case the integral (13) makes sense and can be calculated by means of the theory of residues on
               applying the Jordan lemma (see Subsections 7.1-4 and 7.1-5). After some algebraic manipulations, we obtain
                                             √     αλ         √
                                                                 2
                                       R(x)= – 2π √      exp –|x| α – 2αλ                  (14)
                                                   2
                                                  α – 2αλ
               and finally, in accordance with (6), we obtain

                                         αλ     ∞        √
                                                            2
                            y(x)= f(x)+ √         exp –|x – t| α – 2αλ f(t) dt,  –∞ < x < ∞.  (15)
                                        2
                                       α – 2αλ  –∞
                 © 1998 by CRC Press LLC



               © 1998 by CRC Press LLC
                                                                                                             Page 547
   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569