Page 293 - Handbook Of Multiphase Flow Assurance
P. 293

292                          10.  Research methods in flow assurance

                 Thermodynamic properties
                   Computer models can predict some properties of solids (e.g., ice). TIP4P potential gives
                 a very accurate prediction of the vibrational density of states for ice I h  (Tse, 1994). This
                 agreement with experimental data (Fig.  10.56) for ice may suggest that predictions for
                 hydrates will also be acceptable. By using the SPC model Tse was able to model well the
                 heat capacities of ice Ic, empty sI hydrate lattice, and sI methane hydrate (Tse et al., 1983a).
                 However, the density of ice under pressure is overestimated using the TIP4P model (Tse
                 and Klein, 1988).
                   The large thermal expansivity of hydrate (compared to ice) has been qualitatively re-
                 produced by a constant pressure molecular dynamics (MD) of sI hydrate of ethylene oxide
                 (Tse et al., 1987). The large thermal expansion is rationalized as an excluded volume ef-
                 fect when the guest-host interactions weaken the host-host interactions. Wallqvist (1991)
                 reports the MD study using the SPC potential of phase separation in methane-water sys-
                 tem. Upon addition of methanol to the simulated system he observed a weak preferential
                 solvation of the methyl part of methanol in hydrocarbon core. This effect increased with
                 pressure. At even higher pressure methane became completely miscible in water as water
                 formed clusters around separate methane molecules, resembling a mixture of Lennard-
                 Jones molecules.



                           Density
                           of States
                            0.150

                            0.125


                            0.100


                            0.075

                            0.050


                            0.025


                              0.0
                                 0      5     10     15    20     25     30    35     40
                                                                 –1
                                                    Frequency (cm )
                 FIG. 10.56  Theoretical TIP4P (solid line) and experimental (dashed line) vibrational density of states for ice I h
                 (Tse, 1994).
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298