Page 60 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 60

54                                   Reva E. Johnson and Jonathon W. Sensinger


          However, for many applications these disadvantages are outweighed by the
          advantages, which include improved force rendering, improved force-
          sensing fidelity, larger stable feedback gains (Whitney, 1977), improved
          power densities using a catapult effect (Albu-Sch€affer et al., 2011), and sat-
          uration of maximum impedance at high frequencies (Pratt and Williamson,
          1995). Series elastic actuators reduce environmental impact forces for actu-
          ators without substantial endpoint inertia (Zinn et al., 2004) (paragraph
          excerpt from Sensinger et al., 2013).
             One of the most common and oldest types of inherently low-impedance
          actuators is the series elastic actuator (Pratt and Williamson, 1995)(Fig. 12).
                                                                2
          Newer strategies include the distributed macro-mini (DM ) approach,
          which attempts to solve the trade-off between low impedance and high
          bandwidth by combining two compliant mechanism strategies (Zinn
          et al., 2004).
             Variable impedance actuators take advantage of the benefits of both stiff
          and compliant actuators (Walker and Niemeyer, 2010). Impedance can be
          varied by changing the effective stiffness, damping, and inertia, or by active
          control methods. For a collaborative review and classification of different
          types of variable-impedance actuators, see Vanderborght et al. (2013).
             Variable-stiffness actuators are the most common subset of variable-
          impedance actuators. Stiffness may be varied by changing lever lengths,
          adjusting spring preloads, changing spring lengths, or by using a
          continuously variable transmission. For a review of variable-stiffness
          actuators and their design processes, see Van Ham et al. (2009) and
          Wolf et al. (2016).







                               Motor + Transmission       Load

                      (A)


                               Motor + Transmission       Load


                      (B)
          Fig. 12 Diagram of series elastic actuator with distal compliance (A) and proximal
          compliance (B). (Reproduced with permission from Sensinger, J.W., Burkart, L.E., Pratt, G.A.,
          ff Weir, R.F., 2013. Effect of compliance location in series elastic actuators. Robotica 31 (8),
          1313–1318.)
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65