Page 57 - Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing Principles and Practices
P. 57

compliance to strict design and safety standards, design factors to ensure supply security, financial
               institution requirements, and site remote locations. Plant costs throughout the value chain have
               been declining through design innovations and cost optimization. Further advances in the LNG
               technology can be expected in coming years in the areas of liquefaction and shipping, which can
               lead to lower overall project costs (Cornot-Gandolphe et al., 2003 and Mokhatab et al., 2014). In the
               recent years, a floating LNG (FLNG) design, where processing and storage facilities are based on a
               vessel moored offshore in the vicinity of the production fields, has been proven to reduce costs,
               making development of small and remote gas reserves, offshore gas viable. The FLNG technology
               can reduce costs by minimizing the offshore platforms and pipelines, eliminating the need for port
               facilities, minimizing skill labor at the job sites, and reducing the plant delivery date. Vessel
               construction can be carried out in a low-cost location. However, there are potentially many
               commercial and technical challenges that need to be resolved during the development phase. The
               key is to delineate these challenges and provide innovative solutions to solve these problems (Chiu
               and Quillen, 2006 and Mokhatab et al., 2014).

               1.10.3. Compressed Natural Gas


               Gas can be transported in containers at high pressures, typically 1800    psig for a rich gas

               (significant amounts of ethane, propane, etc.) to roughly 3600    psig for a lean gas (mainly
               methane). Gas at these pressures is termed compressed natural gas (CNG). CNG offers proven
               technology that has the potential to provide an early to market, economic solution for remote
               offshore gas developments with small to medium reserves or for associated gas reserves in large oil
               field developments. It could work where subsea pipelines are not viable because of distance, ocean
               topography, limited reserves, modest demand, or environmental factors, but where LNG is also not
               economical due to its high cost of liquefaction and regasification facilities, or feasible due to
                                         9
               community or safety issues.   In addition to being a cost-effective solution for regional gas projects,
               CNG transport projects also offer several unique and valuable solutions in terms of flexibility and
               risk mitigation compared to the LNG projects (i.e., easy supply and market access, redeployability,
               and scalability).
                 The energy consumed in operating a CNG facility is only about 40% of that of an LNG plant of
               the same capacity. Thus, the threshold volume of gas reserves needed to support a CNG project is
               comparatively small, provided the shipping costs can be kept low. However, the containment for
               CNG is heavier than that for LNG, so the payload per unit weight shipped is smaller. Greater than
               85% of a CNG project costs are likely to be associated with the ships, which are based upon
               conventional bulk carriers with at least four competing certified containment designs (Hatt, 2003):
               EnerSea (US) VOTRANS carbon steel pressure cells; Trans Ocean Gas (Canada) fiber reinforced
               plastic (FRP) covering high-density polyethylene cells; TransCanada CPV steel liner cell
               overwrapped with a glass fiber laminate; and Sea NG (Canada) patented Coselle of coiled X70 high-
               strength steel pipe wound into a cylindrical storage container. EnerSea's VOTRANS (Volume
               Optimized Transport and Storage) containment systems is the most cost-effective CNG solution in
               the marketplace due to greater gas storage/delivery efficiency. With most of the capital costs
               invested in the technology in the vessels, it is important to have a large and experienced shipping
               company such as Teekay at the helm (Wood and Mokhatab, 2008).


               1.10.4. Gas-to-Liquids
               In gas-to-liquids (GTL) transport processes, natural gas is converted to a heavier hydrocarbon
               liquid and transported to the consumers. The technology of converting natural gas to liquids is not
               new. In the first step, methane is mixed with steam and converted to syngas or synthetic gas
               (mixtures of carbon monoxide and hydrogen) by one of a number of routes using a suitable catalyst
               technology (Keshav and Basu, 2007). The syngas is then converted into a liquid using a Fischer-
               Tropsch (FT) process (in the presence of a catalyst) or an oxygenation method (mixing syngas with
               oxygen in the presence of a suitable catalyst). The produced liquid can be a liquid fuel, usually a
               clean burning motor fuel (syncrude), or lubricant, ammonia, methanol, LPG substitute, or some
               precursors for plastics manufacture, e.g., urea, dimethyl ether (DME), or chemical feedstocks
               (Knott, 1997; Skrebowski, 1998; and Apanel, 2005). The environmental benefits of clean burning

                                                           57
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62