Page 152 - Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres
P. 152

130                             Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres

         uptake of nonionic textile finishing agents, e.g., moth-proofing agents (Zahn, 1980)
         has been found in the medulla of coarse keratin fibers.
            In dyeing, kemp fibers are the source of more visible problems than medullated fi-
         bers. Observations on dyed mohair fibers (Smuts and Hunter, 1987) support this dif-
         ferentiation, although a mean medulla diameter to fiber diameter ratio of 0.5 was the
         critical value for undyed fibers. This definition of kemp and medullated fibers differs
         from that often used by animal breeders who regard kemp fibers as medullated and
         short in length. It follows that it is important, not only to keep the number of medul-
         lated and kemp fibers to a minimum in the raw fleece, but also to be able to accurately
         measure the proportion, so as to avoid using fibers with an unacceptable level of
         medullation in certain end-uses, and to remove medullated fiber during dehairing,
         carding, and combing.
            Low temperature dyeing of cashmere results in less cuticle damage and a higher
         tensile strength and elongation compared with higher temperature dyeing of cashmere
         (Li et al., 2012). Cuticle damage of cashmere was greater with dark color dyeing and
         tensile strength was lower compared with lighter color dyeing. Villarroel (1959)
         concluded that the greater scaliness and the ortho-para cortical structure of Huacaya
         alpaca suggest that Huacaya fiber may uptake dye better than Suri alpaca fiber but
         this was not supported by Atav and T€ urkmen (2015) who found that dye uptake in
         wool exceeded that of Suri fiber and Huacaya had the slowest dye uptake. Some of
         these differences between fibers may be related to differences in the MFD of dyelots
         as dye uptake is affected by MFD (Sch€ afer, 1994).


         4.5   Sources of further information

         Information on rare animal fibers is scattered in scientific journals, conference pro-
         ceedings, and books. Often articles with useful information do not have appropriate
         titles or key words to help locate specific data on fibers such as mohair or alpaca.
         Many of the sources for further information provided in the chapter on wool also
         contain articles or information on rare animal fibers. In recent years more research
         on these fibers has been conducted in China and South America but the articles
         have not been translated from Chinese or Spanish and are also difficult to locate.
         Some conference proceedings are now only published for participants and so have
         restricted availability. Much information on rare animal fibers is regarded as intellec-
         tual property and is not published or publically available. The following resources pro-
         vide more detailed reviews of many aspects of the production, processing, and textile
         performance of various rare animal fibers.
         1. Watkins P, Buxton A: Luxury Fibres, The Economist Intelligence Unit Special Report No.
            2633, London, 1992, Business International.
         2. Hunter L: Mohair: a Review of its Properties, Processing and Applications, Port Elizabeth,
            1993, CSIR.
         3. Hunter L: Mohair, cashmere and other animal hair fibres, In Kozlowski RM, editors: Hand-
            book of natural fibres, Types, properties and factors affecting breeding and cultivation
            (vol 1). Oxford, 2012, Woodhead, pp. 196e290.
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157