Page 153 - Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres
P. 153

Physical, chemical, and tensile properties of cashmere, mohair, alpaca  131

           4. McGregor BA: Properties, processing and performance of rare and natural fibres: a review
              and interpretation of existing research results. RIRDC Research Report No. 11/150, Barton,
              Australia, 2012, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Available at:
              https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/11-150.


           References

           Albertin J, Souren I, Rouette H: Cashgora or cashmere? Text Praxis Inter 45:719e723, 1990.
           Algaa S, M€ agel M: Investigation and optimisation of the mechanical dehairing of unsorted fibres
               of cashmere goat, camel and yak, Melliand Text 73:860e865, 1992. E392e395.
           Anonymous: Blue book, London, 1997, International Wool Textile Organisation.
           Anonymous: Cashmere and Camel Hair Manufacturers Institute. http://www.cashmere.org/cm/
               index.php.
           Atav R, T€ urkmen F: Investigation of the dyeing characteristics of alpaca fibers (Huacaya and
               Suri) in comparison with wool, Text Res J 85:1331e1339, 2015.
           Blankenburg G, Philippen H: Importance of cross-sectional parameters of Angora rabbit hair. In
               Aachen, 1988, Schrift. der Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitutet, pp 242e252. Proc. 1st Int.
               Symp. Speciality Animal Fibers, vol. 103. Aachen, 1988, Schrift. der Deutsches Wollfor-
               schungsinstitutet, pp 242e252.
           Carr CM, Leaver IH, Hughes AE: X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of the wool fiber
               surface, Text Res J 56:457e461, 1986.
           Couchman RC: Studies on the cashmere down production of goats, MAgrSc, Melbourne, 1984,
               The University of Melbourne.
           Couchman RC: Effect of breed type, diameter and length on the efficiency of dehairing cash-
               mere, J Text Inst 80:129e137, 1989.
           Couchman RC, Holt CM: Comparison of the shirley analyser and trash separator for dehairing
               cashmere samples, J Text Inst 81:142e155, 1990.
           Dobb MG, Johnston FR, Nott JA, Oster L, Sikorski J, Simpson WS: Morphology of the cuticle
               layer in wool fibres and other animal fibers, J Text Inst 52:153e170, 1961.
           Edmunds AR: The importance of conditioning in fibre diameter measurement, Tech. Report No.
               17, Punta del Este Meeting, London, 1992, International Wool Textile Organisation.
           Forté R: The United States scene. In Proc. 1st Int. Cashmere Seminar, Canberra, Melbourne,
               1985, Australian Cashmere Growers Society, pp 22e24.
           Frank EN, Hick MVH, Adot OG: Descriptive differential attributes of type of fleeces in llama
               fibre and its textile consequence. Part 2: consequences of the dehairing process, J Text Inst
               102:41e49, 2011.
           Frazer Roberts JA: Kemp Part III. Kemp in the fleece of the Welsh Mountain Sheep (vol. 59).
               WIRA Publication, pp 11e27.
           Frishman D, Smith AL, Harris M: Measurement of the frictional properties of wool fibers, Text
               Res J 18:475e480, 1948.
           Garner W: Textile laboratory manual. ed 3 (vol. 5). London, 1967, Heywood Books.
           Harizi T, Msahli S, Sakli F, Khorchani T: Evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of
               Tunisian camel hair, J Text Inst 98:15e21, 2007.
           Harris M, Smith AC: State of the sulphur in oxidized wool, J Res Natl Bur Stand 18:623e628,
               1937.
           Hillbrick GC, Tucker DJ: Effect of nutrition on lipid production and composition of Cashmere
               buck fleece, Small Rumin Res 22:225e230, 1996.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158