Page 197 - Handbook of Surface Improvement and Modification
P. 197

192                                                The Coefficient of Friction


            able silicone resin, a catalyst, at least one lubricating filler not soluble in the coating com-
                                      54
            position and optionally a solvent.
                Base sheets are disclosed having a reduced coefficient of friction in the wet state. 55
            In accordance with the present invention, the base sheets can be treated with a high molec-
            ular weight poly(ethylene oxide), a derivatized poly(ethylene oxide) or an acrylate copoly-
                                           55
            mer containing polyethylene moieties.  The base sheet can be single-ply or multi-ply. 55
            The base sheet can be a tissue product, such as a facial tissue, a bath tissue, or a paper
                 55
                                                                 55
            towel.  Alternatively, the base sheet can be a pre-moistened wipe.
                There is a critical need for film suppliers and film converters to deliver films and
                                                                          56
            sheets that have a consistent COF throughout the surface of the film and sheet.  Presently
            there are no suitable solutions for online, or at-line, COF measurements in the film indus-
              56
            try.  The current worldwide procedure is to measure COF on different areas of the film,
                                        56
            using a separate off-line procedure.  The invention provides an apparatus for the continu-
            ous measurement of the dynamic coefficient of friction and/or static coefficient of friction
            of  a  material,  which  comprises  at  least  the  following:  two  rotating  rollers,  one  roller,
                                                           56
            optionally, one static roller, and two sets of force detectors.
                Media  having  a  high  coefficient  of  friction  can  be  troublesome  in  sheet  feeding
                                                                         57
            printer operations because of the tendency of one sheet to stick to another.  The coeffi-
            cient of friction problem becomes particularly troublesome when a glossy inkjet coating is
                                                                       57
            desired on both sides of the media, in order to support two-sided printing.  The invention
            utilizes low friction materials in an emulsified form to decrease the coefficient of friction
                                    57
            of a two-sided inkjet coating.  The low friction materials include waxes, simple organic
                                                      57
            polymers, silicone polymers or fluorinated polymers.
            REFERENCES
            1  Chen, GS; Liu, X, Friction in Friction Dynamics Principles and Applications, Woodhead Publishing,
               2016, pp. 91-156.
            2  Cho, D-H; Bhushan, B; Dyess, J, Tribology Intl., 94, 165-75, 2016.
            3  Korpela, T; Suvanto, M; Pakkanen, TT; Wear, 328-329, 262-9, 2015.
            4  Álvarez-Láinez, ML; Palacio, JA, Wear, 372-373, 76-80, 2017.
            5  Menezes, PL; Kailas, SV, Biosurface Biotribology, 2, 1-10, 2016.
            6  Korpela, TE; Salstela, J; Suvanto, M; Pakkanen, TT, Wear, 310, 20-6, 2014.
            7  Laux, KA; Jean-Fulcrand, A; Sue, HJ; Bremner, T; Wong, JSS, Polymer, 103, 397-404, 2016.
            8  Wang, Q; Zheng, F; Wang, T, Cryogenics, 75, 19-25, 2016.
            9  Chaudri, AM; Suvanto, M; Pakkanen, TT, Wear, 342-343, 189-197.
            10  Shen, JT; Top, M; Pei, YT; De Hosson, JTM, Wear, 322-323, 171-80, 2015.
            11  Ghorbal, A; Brahim, AB, Polym. Testing, 32, 1174-80, 2013.
            12  Pogacnik, A; Kupec, A; Kalin, M, Wear, 378-379, 17-26, 2017.
            13  Zuo, Z; Song, L; Yang, Y, Tribology Intl., 86, 17-27, 2015.
            14  Zhang, RH; Zhao, J; Liang, J, Surf. Coat. Technol., 299, 90-5, 2016.
            15  Yamaguchi, T; Sugawara, T; Takahashi, M; Shibata, K; Moriyasu, K; Nishiwaki, T; Hokkirigawa, K,
               Tribology Intl., 116, 264-71, 2017.
            16  Zalaznik, M; Kalin, M; Novak, S, Tribology Intl., 94, 92-7, 2016.
            17  Ramalho, A; Szekeres, P; Fernandes, E, Tribology Intl., 63, 29-33, 2013.
            18  Schreiner, S; Rechberger, M; Bertling, J, Tribology Intl., 63, 21-8, 2013.
            19  Mondal, S; Reddy, V; Sarkar, A; Aravindakshan, P; Ghatak, A, Tribology Intl., 97, 38-48, 2016.
            20  Sachs, U; Akkerman, R; Fetfatsidis, K; Vidal-Salle, E; Schumacher, J; Ziegmann, G; Allaoui, S; Hivet, G;
               Maron, B; Vanclooster, K; Lomov, SV, Composites: Part A, 67, 289-98, 2014.
            21  Pei, XQ; Friedrich, K, Friction and Wear of Polymer Composites. Reference Module in Materials
               Science and Materials Engineering, Elsevier 2016.
            22  Grewal, HS; Pendyala, P; Shin, H; Cho, I-J; Yoon, E-S, Wear, 384-385, 151-8, 2017.
            23  Paoletti, A; Lambiase, F; Ili, AD, Procedia CIRP, 33, 562-7, 2015.
            24  Divry, V; Jacomine, L; Le Houérou, V; Collin, D; Gauthier, C; Holl, Y, Prog. Org. Coat., 113, 189-99,
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202