Page 53 - Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Communication Competence Language and Communication Problems Practical Solutions
P. 53

A cognitive pragmatic perspective on communication and culture  31


                          3.     A cognitive pragmatic perspective
                                 on communication and culture            1

                                            ˇ
                                 Vladimir Zegarac



                          1.     Introduction


                             I would define a social situation as an environment of mutual monitoring possibil-
                             ities, anywhere within which an individual will find himself accessible to the naked
                             senses of all others who are ‘present’, and similarly find them accessible to him.
                                                                         Goffman ([1964] 1972: 63)

                          The impact of Erving Goffman’s work on the development of social approaches
                          to human interaction has been immense, but the fundamentally cognitive char-
                          acter of his definition of “social situation” – clearly reflected in the notion of
                          “mutual monitoring” – has been largely ignored. This is apparent in the way the
                          term situation is characterized within Fishman’s (1972: 48) sociolinguistics (as
                          “the co-occurrence of two (or more) interlocutors related to each other in a par-
                          ticular way, communicating about a particular topic, in a particular setting”), in
                          Halliday’s (see Halliday and Hasan 1976: 22) functionalist view of language
                          (where field, mode and tenor are the key determinants of situations), in Hymes’
                          (1972) ethnographic approach to communication (in which the categories of set-
                          ting, participant, end, act sequence, key, instrumentalities, norms of interaction
                          and interpretation, and genre provide a template for analysing communicative
                          events) and in much other work in the loosely defined field of (social) prag-
                          matics. To be sure, these authors are aware of the psychological nature of situ-
                          ation. Thus, Halliday and Hasan (1976) observe:

                             The term SITUATION, meaning the ‘context of situation’ in which a text is em-
                             bedded, refers to all those extra-linguistic factors which have some bearing on the
                             text itself. A word of caution is needed about this concept. At the moment, as the text
                             of this Introduction is being composed, it is a typical English October day in Palo
                             Alto, California; a green hillside is visible outside the window, the sky is grey, and it
                             is pouring with rain. This might seem to be part of the ‘situation’ of this text; but it is
                             not, because it has no relevance to the meanings expressed, or to the words or gram-
                                                                            ˇ
                             matical patterns that are used to express them [emphasis VZ].
                                                                       Halliday and Hasan (1976: 21)

                          Despite the general awareness that the concept of (communication) situation
                          calls for a psychological explanation, existing definitions of this term tend to
                          have a distinctly externalist-descriptive, rather than an internalist-explanatory
                          flavour. The main aim of this article is to provide an introductory internalist,
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58