Page 56 - Highway Engineering Handbook Building and Rehabilitating the Infrastructure
P. 56

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES                     39

                              Historic Places are present or potentially present (such as in an archaeologically sensitive
                              area), there must be early public involvement. Projects are excepted from this requirement
                              if (1) they have been defined as having a minimal APE and therefore do not fall within the
                              Section 106 definition of undertakings and (2) no known historic resources are present.
                              Opportunity for involvement by the public generally occurs at the identification, evalua-
                              tion, and consultation stages for projects categorically excluded from review under NEPA.
                                For those actions requiring evaluation in an EA, notices concerning the initiation of the
                              environmental review process or opportunities for public review must state whether any
                              alternatives could potentially involve historic properties. If this uncertain then the notices
                              must request the names of those persons who may have information relating to historic
                              properties that may be affected or who may be interested in the effects of the undertaking
                              on historic properties. At any hearing, the effects of any alternatives on such properties
                              must be identified.
                                For projects where an EA or EIS has been prepared, documentation of completion of the
                              Section 106 process should be included in the completed document. For categorically
                              excluded projects, Section 106 documentation is completed separately when resources have
                              been identified.


                              1.4.6 Federal Requirements Protecting Disadvantaged
                              and Minority Populations

                              Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d et seq.).  The Civil Rights Act of
                              1964 was arguably the most instrumental piece of legislation in providing an opportunity
                              voice for minorities to participate in the review of federal capital programs. The Act pro-
                              hibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in projects or programs
                              receiving federal financial assistance.
                              The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
                              (Public Law 91-646).  The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
                              Policies Act provides benefits and protection for persons whose real property is acquired
                              or who would be displaced from acquired property because of a project or program that
                              receives federal funds. A displaced person may be an individual, family, business, farm, or
                              nonprofit organization. Just compensation is required, and guidelines exist for ensuring fair
                              treatment.
                              Environmental Justice—Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environ-
                              mental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations (February 11,
                              1994). Executive Order 12898 was issued to address disproportionately high and adverse
                              human health and environmental impacts on low-income and minority populations. The
                              U.S. DOT issued DOT Order 5680.1 on April 15, 1997, to ensure that each modal agency
                              within the DOT complies with this executive order. A number of state agencies have adopted
                              analogous procedures requiring an evaluation of projects to determine whether they would
                              result in a disproportionate adverse impact on minority or low-income populations.



                              1.5 LEAD-BASED PAINT REMOVAL

                              A significant number of state-maintained steel bridges are coated with lead-based paint.
                              Steel bridges were coated with lead-based paint for more than 40 years. The coating sys-
                              tems have an expected effective life of 15 to 25 years, and those on many bridges are now
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61