Page 171 - Historical Dictionary of Political Communication in the United States
P. 171

160
                                                                    by
                                                                       Maxwell
                                                              edited
                                                                               Mc-
                 ings  on  Media,  Public  Opinion,  and  Policymaking,  SELECTED  BIBLIOGRAPHY
                 Combs  and  David  Protess.  It  includes  the  original  study  of  McCombs  and
                 Donald Shaw that touched  off the interest in agenda setting a quarter of a century
                 ago. It  also has  a number  of  other  studies that have appeared  in  communication
                 journals  and  thus  offers  a  substantial run  of  data  about  agenda  setting.
                   If  you  would  rather  read  a  series  of  syntheses  looking  into  varied  aspects  of
                 agenda setting, then you should read Communication and Democracy: Exploring
                 the Intellectual  Frontiers  in Agenda-Setting  Theory, edited by McCombs, Shaw,
                 and  David  Weaver.
                   Agenda setting assumed at the outset that media set the agenda. Other research
                  suggested  politicians  may  set  it.  Yet,  on  reflection,  the  public  may  set  it  and
                  apparently  has  set  it  in  some  instances.  This  aspect  of  agenda  setting  is  dealt
                 with  in  The Public  and  the National  Agenda,  by  Wayne  Wanta.
                    Another  area  of  research  is covered  in  The Main  Source: Learning from  Tel-
                  evision News, by John Robinson  and Mark Levy. While surveys show television
                  as  the  most  frequently  named  medium  as  the  main  source,  this  book  makes  it
                  clear  that  television  is  not  an  effective  source  of  political  information.  Its  con-
                  tribution  apparently  has  to  do  with  images.
                    The  theory  of  cognitive  dissonance  has  generated  a  great  deal  of  empirical
                  data.  It  begins  with  Leon  Festinger's  book,  Theory  of  Cognitive  Dissonance.
                  Brief  and  readable,  it  makes  a  lot  of  things  that  happen  in  political  communi-
                  cation  make  sense.
                    For an overall view  of theory  and research, we would suggest  Communication
                  Theories, by Werner  J.  Severin  and James W. Tankard.  It deals with more than
                  political  communication,  but  the book  is  organized  in  a way  that  makes  issues
                  related  to  political  communication  easy  to find.
                    Beyond  this list is the frontier  of political communication  found  in such jour-
                  nals  as Journalism  and Mass  Communication  Quarterly, Journal  of  Communi-
                  cation,  Political  Communication,  and  Public  Opinion  Quarterly.


                  REFERENCES
                  Steven  H.  Chaffee  and  John  L.  Hochheimer,  "The  Beginnings  of  Political  Communi-
                       cation  Research  in  the United  States:  Origins  of  the Limited  Effects  Model,"  in
                       Michael  Gurevitch  and  Mark  R.  Levy,  eds., Mass  Communication Review  Year-
                       book,  Vol.  5  (Beverly  Hills, Calif.:  Sage,  1985).
                  Peter  Clarke  and  Susan  H.  Evans,  Covering  Campaigns:  Journalism  in  Congressional
                       Elections  (Stanford,  Calif.:  Stanford  University  Press,  1983).
                  Timothy  Crouse,  The Boys  on  the Bus  (New  York:  Random  House,  1973).
                  Leon  Festinger,  Theory  of  Cognitive  Dissonance  (Stanford,  Calif.:  Stanford  University
                       Press,  1957).
                  Richard  Hofstetter,  Bias  in  the News  (Columbus:  Ohio  State University  Press,  1976).
                  Kathleen  Hall  Jamieson,  Dirty  Politics:  Deception,  Distraction,  and  Democracy  (New
                       York:  Oxford  University  Press,  1992).
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176