Page 60 - Historical Dictionary of Political Communication in the United States
P. 60

BENJAMIN
                                                                          49
           FRANKLIN,
           explains the thinking process  when a person chooses one option versus  another.
           After  the  decision  is  made,  the  person  will  have  some  degree  of  doubt  or  un-
           certainty  about  the  choice.  The  degree  or  intensity  of  that  doubt  relates  to  the
           degree  or  intensity  of  the  similarities  of  outcomes  between  the  two  choices  in
           the  person's  mind.  The  cognitive  dissonance  concept  is  important  to  political
           communications  because  it  may  explain  why  people  are  not  persuaded  by  in-
           formation  they  receive  from  candidates  or  the  media.  What  Festinger  demon-
           strated  was  that  people  experiencing  dissonance  seek  consonant  information—
           that is, information  supporting  their  decision  or choice—and  avoid  information
           that will add to their dissonance. Festinger also taught at Massachusetts Institute
           of  Technology,  the  University  of  Michigan,  and  the  University  of  Minnesota.
           His book,  Theory of  Cognitive Dissonance,  was published  in  1957.

           SOURCES: David  Cohen, Psychologists  on Psychology,  second  edition,  1995;  Vemon
           J.  Nordby  and Calvin  S. Hall, A  Guide  to Psychologists and Their Concepts,  1914.
                                                          Guido H.  Stempel HI

           FIRST  AMENDMENT.    See Abrams  v.  United States; Clear  and  Present  Dan-
           ger; Eichman  Case; Hustler  v. Falwell; Miami Herald  v. Tornillo; Near  v. Min-
           nesota;  New  York  Times  v.  Sullivan;  Pentagon  Papers;  Progressive  Case;
           Richmond Newspapers  v.  Virginia',  Schenck,  Seditious Libel; Symbolic  Speech;
           John  Peter  Zenger.

           FRAMING   is agenda  setting by the media to create a particular context around
           an issue  or a candidate. This is done by  selecting  certain  aspects and emphasiz-
           ing  them  continuously  while  ignoring  other  equally  important  aspects.
             Media  are  being  criticized  for  creating  a  negative  frame  for  political  candi-
           dates.  Any  presidential  candidate  becomes  subject  to  negative  coverage  by  the
           media,  and  many  feel  that  such  coverage  is  out  of  proportion.  However  trivial
           the  negatives,  they  outweigh  the positives, no  matter  how  significant.
             Some  critics  are  suggesting  that  this  is  one  reason  voter  participation  is de-
           clining  in  this  country.  Others  have  suggested  that  such  coverage  discourages
           people  from  running  for  office.
             Framing  is  not  restricted  to  coverage  of  political  candidates.  In  particular,  it
           applies  to  political  issues.  For  example,  welfare  has  been  cast  largely  in  the
           frame  of the lazy poor  and welfare  fraud.  Likewise, health care reform  has been
           cast  in  the  frame  of  socialized  medicine.  Like  stereotypes,  frames  restrict  the
           dialogue  on  issues.
           SOURCE: Michael  B.  Salwen  and  Don  W.  Stacks, An Integrated Approach  to  Com-
           munication  Theory and Research,  1996.
                                                          Guido H.  Stempel III

           FRANKLIN, BENJAMIN     (1706-1790)  is often  best known  for  his impressive
           achievements  as  colonial  printer,  editor,  entrepreneur,  and  author  of  a  widely
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65