Page 42 - How To Implement Lean Manufacturing
P. 42

Lean Manufacturing and the Toyota Pr oduction System      23


                       Suddenly, much of what a typical plant does is now questioned if this concept is
                    truly employed. Of course, producing defective units is not a value-added activity, but
                    consider packaging and transportation, for example. We go through serious design
                    efforts to develop good packaging so we can transport the parts of an automobile, for
                    example, to the final assembly plant. We utilize design tools such as Failure Mode Effect
                    Analyses (FMEA) in the design of the packaging to assure we have no losses during
                    transportation, and that the end packaging is suitable for our customer. Now Ohno calls
                    not only the packaging we so carefully designed waste, but the transportation costs as
                    well. The customer does not care that the steel came from Brazil. He does not care that
                    the steel was packaged and transported to Mexico, where it was stamped into a wiper
                    blade holder and then packaged and sent to Detroit to be assembled into a wiper blade
                    assembly so it could be packaged and transported to the automobile assembly plant in
                    Tennessee, where it could be installed on a car, which was then prepped and trans-
                    ported to Seattle, Washington for sale to some customer.
                       The customer does not care that this wiper blade traveled 25,000 miles and went
                    through four packagings and four unpackagings, hundreds of handlings, and four tiers
                    of suppliers with all the associated costs, before it was even attached to his car. His
                    primary concern is that he gets good value for his expenditure.
                       This understanding and application of value is truly revolutionary.
                       Another way to look at this concept is by comparing it to what is called the Golden
                    Rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” This is great advice and
                    quite frankly a real stretch for me and others to aspire to. It requires that you think care-
                    fully about a situation, and think about exactly what you would like them to do to you.
                    The question is, “How would you like them to act upon you?”—and then proceed to do
                    the same with them. This level of introspection and detachment is extremely difficult,
                    yet when followed it will lead to a higher level of awareness and a higher moral aware-
                    ness as well. It is then hoped that this awareness will lead one to a more appropriate
                    action on their part.
                       But I maintain that there is a flaw in this logic. It requires that you act on them as you
                    would like to be acted upon. Well, what about their wishes? Sometimes these things can be
                    reduced to simplicity for understanding. Apply this to something simple, such as buying
                    a present for someone. If you follow this maxim, you will end up getting them what you
                    want. Well, maybe that would be a good gift, but should we not get people what they
                    want? I think so. And that is what makes getting gifts so difficult at times: It requires a
                    high level of empathy—a quantity that is in increasingly shorter supply in our narcis-
                    sistic world. Therefore, I believe the Golden Rule should instead be, “Do unto others as
                    they would wish to have done unto themselves.” Then they get what they want, not
                    what you want.
                       This is what Ohno did, he put himself in the shoes of the customer and looked at
                    value. Well, you might argue that this is what most typical plants do. On this point,
                    I doubt this is the case, however. Plants look first to survive and second to prosper
                    financially. Concepts to the contrary make for good discussions, but in the end if the
                    place makes money, it stays in business. If it does not, it disappears. Not too compli-
                    cated. So the typical plant, while looking at production rates, cost, and quality—and
                    seemingly looking to the customer—are actually only looking internally, in order to
                    survive and prosper.
                       Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with surviving and prospering. After
                    all, the customer counts on and needs the product; the people need the jobs created by
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47