Page 100 - Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production Second Edition
P. 100

Safety and the Environment                                             87



                                          Identify and describe
                                           potential hazards






                                         Evaluate likelihood and
                                         consequences of hazard





                                          Apply risk reduction
                                              measures


             Figure 5.3  General approach to quantitative risk analysis (QRA).


             individuals to large groups, and their tasks may take days or months. The contractors
             are therefore the group with the highest exposure to the operations, and often the
             least familiar with the particular practices on an installation, since they move between
             oil companies, and between installations. Special attention must be given to in-
             corporating the contractors into the prevailing SMS by familiarising them with a new
             location and work practices. This may be achieved through a safety induction-training
             course.
                Design procedures are developed with the intention of improving the safety of
             equipment. Tools used in this step are hazard and operability studies and quantitative
             risk analysis (QRA). The following scheme may be used (Figure 5.3).
                In the first step, a screening process will be applied to separate the major
             potential hazards, and a risk register or risk matrix is established; major hazards will be
             addressed in more detail (see also Section 15.3.2, Chapter 15). QRA techniques are
             used to evaluate the extent of the risk arising from hazards with the potential to
             cause major accidents, based on the prediction of the likelihood and consequence of
             the event. This assessment will be based on engineering judgement and statistics
             of previous performance. Where necessary, risk reduction measures will be applied
             until the level of risk is acceptable or ‘ALARP’. The acronym stands for as low as
             reasonably practicable, and is a term often used in the context of safety-critical and
             high-integrity systems. The ALARP principle is that the residual risk shall be as low
             as reasonably practicable. For the risk to be ALARP it must be demonstrated that
             the cost involved in reducing the risk further would be grossly disproportionate to
             the benefit gained. In other words it would be possible to spend infinite time, effort
             and money attempting to reduce a risk to zero.
                ‘Permit to Work’ procedures are written to ensure that activities are performed
             in a systematic way. Before conducting work that involves confined space entry,
             work on energy systems, ground disturbance in locations where buried hazards
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105