Page 128 - The Power to Change Anything
P. 128

Surpass Your Limits 117


                   One thing was clear from these studies: The ability to delay
               gratification did predict a large number of long-term results.
               That part of the marshmallow research nobody was arguing
               about. However, for years scientists continued to debate the
               cause of this strong effect. Did self-control stem from an
               intractable personality characteristic or something more mal-
               leable and thus learnable?
                   In 1965, Dr. Mischel collaborated on a study with Albert
               Bandura who openly challenged the assumption that will was
               a fixed trait. Always a student of human learning, Bandura
               worked with Mischel to design an experiment to test the sta-
               bility of subjects who had delayed gratification. In an experi-
               ment similar to the marshmallow studies, the two scholars
               observed fourth- and fifth-graders in similar circumstances.
               They placed children who had not demonstrated that they
               could delay gratification into contact with adult role models
               who knew how to delay. The greedy kids observed adults who
               put their heads down for a nap or who got up from the chair
               and engaged in some distracting activity. The original “grab-
               bers” saw techniques for delaying gratification. And to every-
               one’s delight, they followed suit.
                   After a single exposure to an adult model, children who pre-
               viously hadn’t delayed suddenly became stars at delaying. Even
               more interesting, in follow-up studies conducted months later,
               the children who had learned to delay retained much of what
               they’d learned during the brief modeling session. So what
               about those hardwired genetic characteristics or traits that had
               predicted so much?
                   The answer to this important question is good news to all
               of us and most certainly offers hope to Henry. When Mischel
               took a closer look at individuals who routinely held out for
               the greater reward, he concluded that delayers are simply
               more skilled at avoiding short-term temptations. They didn’t
               merely avoid the temptation; they employed specific, learnable
               techniques that kept their attention off what would be merely
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133