Page 106 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 106

Tally: GCV
                  P2: GCO/GCZ
   P1: GYG/GAQ
                                          August 13, 2002
                            CY101-Bimber
   CY101-03
              0 521 80067 6
                                            3            10:56


                         The Fourth Information Revolution
                           and Postbureaucratic Pluralism











                     THE QUESTION OF INFORMATION ABUNDANCE
              The capacities of competing political actors and organizations are most
              often measured by yardsticks involving money, staff, experience, and or-
              ganization,butrarelyinformation.Theideathatdemocraticpowertends
              to flow to the most well-endowed political actors, financially and organi-
              zationally, exerts a far-reaching influence on conceptions of politics and
              democracy. Much research on pluralism and interest group politics in the
              United States is based on the premise that financial and organizational
              requirements pose a barrier to national-scale collective action, and that
              in policy competition, those with more financial and organizational re-
              sourcestendtoprevailinthelongrunoverthosewithfewerresources.The
              conclusion from the last chapter that policy and political influence tend
              to flow to the best informed provides an explanation for this resources–
              power relationship: Resources confer command over information and
              communication, and command over these enhances political influence.
                This approach to explaining political power leads to an interesting
              question. Throughout the series of information revolutions and regimes
              thusfarinAmericanhistory,developmentsateachstephavestrengthened
              the link between resources and command of information, making orga-
              nizational and financial infrastructure of one kind or another ever more
              importantforfacilitywithinformationandpoliticalcommunication.In-
              formation and communication have been comparatively scarce, costly,
              and unevenly available to political actors, and on this foundation his-
              torical developments in the complexity and organization of informa-
              tion have proceeded, facilitating in turn the evolution of parties, in-
              terest groups, and candidate organizations. If technological or other
              developments somehow altered this foundation, so that information and


                                            89
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111