Page 126 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 126

P2: GCO/GCZ
                                Tally: GCV
   P1: GYG/GAQ
                                                         10:56
   CY101-03
                            CY101-Bimber
              0 521 80067 6
                                          August 13, 2002
                         Postbureaucratic Political Organization
                 Table 3.2. Constraints on Postbureaucratic Political Organization
              1. The dynamics of mass media and public attention.
              2. The need to interact with unchanging formal institutions of government.
              3. The importance of personal relationships based on familiarity and trust.
              4. The requirement of sustained performance across events and throughout
                the policy process.
              5. The discounted value of inexpensive information and communication.


              familiarity, and the need for sustained performance across events and
              processes, this problem of the discounted value of inexpensive informa-
              tion constrains the exploitation of postbureaucratic forms by organiza-
              tions. These five factors are summarized in Table 3.2.
                Moreover, no single organizational structure is superior for all sit-
              uations in any case, regardless of era or informational context. Not all
              industrial-era organizations resembled classical Weberian bureaucracies,
              but the Weberian model still provided powerful insights into organiza-
              tion and administration. Similarly, not all information-era organizations
              are likely to exhibit postbureaucratic features such as these. Large
              organizations may differ from small ones; organizations aimed at one
              political strategy or function should differ from those pursuing others;
              organizations whose leaders have autocratic styles should differ from
              those whose leaders tend toward collaboration, consultation, and del-
              egation; organizations facing instability in their environments should
              be organized differently from those operating under conditions of cer-
              tainty and stability. Even within individual organizations, substructures
              vary. For all these reasons, the connection between information abun-
              dance and postbureaucratic pluralism indicates a theoretical direction
              for changes in politics rather than a universal condition.
                This connection raises the empirical question of evidence: In practice,
              dopostbureaucraticorganizationsexistinpolitics,andifso,whatdothey
              look like? To what extent does contemporary politics conform to the
              bureaucratic conception of political organization, and to what extent to
              the postbureaucratic conception? These questions are the subject of the
              next chapter.









                                            109
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131