Page 132 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 132

P1: GYG/IJD/IBA/IJD
              0 521 80067 6
                                          August 14, 2002
   CY101-04
                            CY101-Bimber
                                       Introduction      18:0
              networks and a password-secured web site to coordinate a very rapid
              and intense exchange of information among groups, including working
              drafts of legislation that would be requested of Congress. According to a
              senior counsel of the American Banking Association, this system permit-
              ted creation of consensus positions on policy among groups in record
              time, as well as permitting outward flow of requests for contacts with
              members of Congress to the many coalition partners and the tens of
              thousands of businesses represented by them. He says, “The Internet
              has brought more people into the loop ... it just picks up the pace on
              everything ... [and] gives everyone more time to communicate.” 10  The
              impetus for such a large-scale cooperative effort was inherent in the
              breadth of the policy question at hand, but organizers at NAM insist that
              the new modes of communication dramatically enhanced the capacity
              of the groups to interact and coordinate very rapidly across the various
              business sectors. Virtually all information moved among organizations
              through the Internet, and the group claimed it could produce lobbyists
              in members’ offices from many groups at once within half an hour of
              distributing a call for action. According to Jan Amundsen, Vice President
              and General Counsel of NAM, the group came under extraordinary pres-
              surefrommembersofCongresstobreakapart,becauselegislatorswanted
              to create individual deals for each industry. The capacity to move infor-
              mation rapidly among the groups using new technology twice helped
              hold the diverse coalition together all the way through the legislative
                     11
              process. By August of 1998, the group had won passage of its first bill,
              the Information Readiness and Disclosure Act of 1998, and by June of
              1999, a second bill, the Y2K Liability Act. Amundsen believes that this
              coalition’s connections through high-speed, information-rich commu-
              nication channels was a prototype for the future formation of business
              coalitions spanning traditional groups.
                Stories similar to NAM’s appeared throughout the political system in
              the late 1990s. For example, in 1999, Congress completed a last-minute
              reauthorization of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act. The reautho-
              rization funded legal and health services for women and also provided
              rape and abuse prevention education, law enforcement grants, and other
              measures. It was in jeopardy of stalling in early 1999 despite years of
              lobbying by a large and disparate coalition of women’s groups, in large

              10
                Gordon Glaza, Senior Counsel, American Banking Association, telephone interview
                by Diane Johnson for the author, May 29, 2000.
              11
                Jan Amundsen, Vice President and General Counsel, National Association of Manu-
                facturers, telephone interview by Diane Johnson for the author, May 11, 2000.
                                            115
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137