Page 134 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 134

P1: GYG/IJD/IBA/IJD
              0 521 80067 6
                                          August 14, 2002
   CY101-04
                            CY101-Bimber
                                       Introduction      18:0
              situation by itself, the story of a network of gay rights supporters backing
              a sailor being drummed out of the Navy became newsworthy. Eventu-
              ally, the New York Times and ABC’s World News Tonight covered the
              story. According to Aravosis, the Internet permitted a few activists to
              bypass the originally uninterested media outlets, creating public inter-
              est without them. Once a threshold of interest was crossed, the media
              took on the story. He says, “What’s new here is the ability to get the
              message out without going through the [traditional] media. We were
              able to get [McVeigh’s story] to thousands of people without ever calling
              one print reporter.” 16  With only a little hyperbole, Wockner observes,
              “In the old days, Activist A had to call Reporter B at Paper C and hope
              that the editor was interested. That strategy used to take two weeks to
              get anything out and only reached the readers of gay newspapers. The
              Net has changed all that. Now it takes 10 minutes to reach millions.” 17
              The effort failed to save McVeigh’s job at the Navy, but it demonstrated
              how a group with few resources and essentially no organizational struc-
              ture could place an issue on the national policy agenda, even if only
              briefly.
                The same year, the protests and violence at the 1999 Seattle meeting
              of the World Trade Organization (WTO) illustrated similar organiza-
              tional dynamics. The far-flung collection of activist, labor, and student
              groups that comprised the late 1990s antisweatshop movement oper-
              ated through a decentralized network of electronic mail, chat rooms,
              and eventually a web site dedicated solely to organizing for the protest.
              They used these tools to recruit participants for Seattle, share infor-
              mation, and coordinate activities. According to one participant during
              the organizing phase, “Rightnow,everytimewedoanaction,wesend
              out an e-mail and a hundred people show up. It’s like magic. We couldn’t
              do it without e-mail.” 18  By one account, the genesis of the protests can
              be traced to an electronic mail campaign initiated eleven months before
              the WTO meetings, with a single message distributed by Public Citizens’
              GlobalTradeWatch.FromthateventthroughthestreetprotestsinSeattle,
              events had a self-organizing character independent of central planning
              and finance. Protesters drew together from several nations a disparate

              16
                Quoted in Steve Friess, “Cyberactivism,” The Advocate, no. 780 (March 2, 1999),
                p. 37.
              17
                Quoted in Steve Silberman, “Wiring the Gay World,” Wired, on-line edition, Aug. 5,
                1998, http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,14229,00.html.
              18
                Cited in B. J. Bullert, “Strategic Public Relations, Sweatshops, and the Making of a
                Global Movement,” unpublished paper, Seattle University, May 18, 2000, p. 3.
                                            117
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139