Page 145 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 145

P1: GYG/IJD/IBA/IJD
                                                       18:0
                                        August 14, 2002
                          CY101-Bimber
  CY101-04
            0 521 80067 6
                                  Political Organizations
              preliminary regulations that would be called “Know Your Customer.” Ac-
              cordingtoofficialsoftheagencies,membersofthebankingindustrywere
              very active in crafting the regulations with agency staff. Although the four
              agencies possessed the authority to act without additional authorization
              from Congress, in 1998, a bill passed the House without fanfare that
              required the Treasury Secretary to promulgate “Know Your Customer”
              rules within 120 days. 38
                 By the end of the year, the House bill had not been taken up in the
              Senate, but the four agencies proceeded with the rule-making process
              anyway.OnDecember7,theypublishedNoticesofProposedRulemaking
              for nearly identical versions of a “Know Your Customer” policy that
              was structured as further implementation of the Bank Secrecy Act. 39
              The proposed regulations “would require each banking organization to
              develop a program designed to determine the identity of its customers;
              determine its customers’ sources of funds; determine, understand and
              monitor the normal and expected transactions of its customers; and
              reportappropriatelyanytransactionsofitscustomersthataredetermined
              to be suspicious.” 40
                 In their regulations, the agencies revealed more of the nature of in-
              dustry support than perhaps they should have. They wrote that the rules
              were an aid to banks who were already required to report “suspicious”
              activity and in particular to those already profiling their customers who
              might have found it “difficult to convince customers of the need to
              provide certain information.” Because customer profiling and report-
              ing would “now be required by regulation, financial institutions will not
              be prejudiced or criticized for needlessly inquiring into the affairs of
              their customers” as compared with banks not using Know Your Cus-
              tomer rules. 41  The regulations therefore constituted support for ma-
              jor, mainstream banks over institutions not engaged in typical ABA
              practices and provided them with an excuse for actions that might
              be offensive to customers. From the perspective of December 7, when
              the Federal Register published the proposed regulations, “Know Your
              Customer” had all the earmarks of favored regulation provided by the

              38
                The Money Laundering Deterrence Act of 1998. See http://www.house.gov/banking/
                hr4005rp.pdf.
              39
                Federal Register vol. 63, no. 234, part 2 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
                Office), Dec. 7, 1998 (Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Parts 208, 211, 225; U.S. De-
                partment of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 12 CFR Part 21;
                Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 12 CFR Part 326; Department of the Treasury,
                Office of Thrift Supervision, 12 CFR Part 563).
              40                      41
                Federal Register, p. 67516.  Ibid., p. 67517.
                                            128
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150