Page 22 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 22

P1: FpQ/IPH/GYQ
                                          August 14, 2002
              0 521 80067 6
                            CY101-Bimber
                                                         17:40
   CY101-01
                            Information and Political Change
              or learning at the individual level. It does not appear, at least so far, that
              new technology leads to higher aggregate levels of political engagement.
              The failure to identify major effects has a great deal in common with
              the “limited effects” tradition in media studies dating back to the work
              of Paul Lazersfeld in the 1940s. That literature sought and failed to find
              substantial direct effects of mass media on public opinion and other de-
              pendent variables common in the study of political behavior. Its failure
              to account for processes such as agenda setting and framing was key, and
              this provides clues in the search for effects of contemporary information
              technology. It seems clear so far that information technology does not
              exert large direct effects on traditional participation and public opinion,
              but it is far from clear what other effects might exist.
                The second finding in scholarship on information technology and
              politics is the existence of the so-called digital divide, a gap between
              those “on line” and “off line” that falls along socioeconomic, racial, and
              genderlines.Theclaimisthataccesstothenewinformationenvironment
              is decidedly unequal, and moreover, it is unequal in ways that exacerbate
              traditional divisions and inequalities in society. The evidence for this
              effect is now substantial and unequivocal. However, viewed in light of
              the limited participation effects finding, the implications of the digital
              divide are less than certain.
                The third finding from research so far is the presence of novel forms
              of collective action. A number of descriptive case studies – the earli-
              est dating to the mid-1990s – have documented instances of unusual
              groupings of citizens organizing and using information technology in
              pursuit of political objectives. The emphasis in these studies is the ca-
              pacity of political entrepreneurs to overcome resource barriers by using
              comparatively inexpensive information technology. These events suggest
              interesting developments in the nature of collective action, the limited
              participation effects and digital divide notwithstanding, and the case of
              the Libertarians and the FDIC falls into this category.
                This book begins where these three strands of literature leave off, in
              an effort both to advance our understanding of their findings and to
              integrate them into a larger picture. The book addresses the following
              questions: What do stories such as the Know Your Customer protest
              mean? Will similar developments lead to political transition as well as
              technical change? What do the possibilities portend for how scholars
              theorize about politics? Increasingly, the important intellectual tasks as-
              sociated with information technology and democracy involve synthe-
              sizing a larger causal picture across events and cases in order to assess


                                            5
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27