Page 28 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 28

P1: FpQ/IPH/GYQ
              0 521 80067 6
                                          August 14, 2002
                                                         17:40
                            CY101-Bimber
   CY101-01
                            Information and Political Change
                “Information” need not stand in opposition to opinions, stories,
              rhetoric, or signals about value structures. Information might be a “fact”
              about the rate of inflation published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis
              just as well as a political official’s statement about the need to control in-
              flation. A candidate’s promise on a web site or broadcast advertisement
              “to protect Social Security” conveys certain political information, just as
              a Congressional Budget Office report on Social Security fund solvency
              conveys other information of a different and perhaps more satisfyingly
              “objective” sort. Information is simply something that can be known or
              communicated.
                To avoid epistemological and ontological concerns that fall outside the
              scope of this book, it is useful not to bind the definition of information
              too tightly to the human acts of perception and knowing. I assume that
              information can exist independently of its perception and understanding
              by any particular political actor. It is important, however, to observe the
              intimacy of the connection between “communication” and “informa-
              tion,” as implied in the Oxford definition. Throughout this book, I use
              “communication” to mean simply the transfer or exchange of informa-
              tion. Certainly, different forms of communication may convey different
              quantities of information in different ways, but I do not attempt to isolate
              the two concepts.
                My definition of information therefore extends well beyond facts, and
              my definition of communication well beyond a quantitative transmis-
              sion model. My conception of information is consistent with Inguun
              Hagen’s interpretation of the process of television news-watching by citi-
              zens, which may involve not only becoming informed in a narrow sense,
              but also diversion, habit or ritual, and fulfillment of a sense of duty or
              obligation. 21  Information defined this way permeates human activity,
              and in principle the complete range of human meaning can be conveyed
              by communication.
                Defined this broadly, information becomes vital to democracy in myr-
              iad ways: in the processes by which citizen preferences are formed and
              aggregated, in the behaviors of citizens and elites, in formal procedures of
              representation, in acts of governmental decision making, in the adminis-
              tration of laws and regulations, and in the mechanisms of accountability
              thatfreshendemocracyandsustainitslegitimacy.Noneoftheseelements
              of the democratic process can operate apart from the exchange and flow


              21  Inguun Hagen, “Communicating to an Ideal Audience: News and the Notion of an
                ‘Informed Citizen,’” Political Communication 14, no. 4 (1997): 405–419.


                                            11
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33