Page 47 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 47

P1: FpQ/IPH/GYQ
                                                       17:40
                                        August 14, 2002
                          CY101-Bimber
  CY101-01
            0 521 80067 6
                             Information and Political Change
              or even singular. This premise has fueled speculation about whether the
              Internetwilladvanceorunderminepoliticalequality–asifitmuststrictly
              do one or the other. Historically, this kind of thinking about technology
              has often been colored strongly with optimism. The development of
              poweredflight,forinstance,wasmetwithexpectationsofincreasedworld
                                                         37
              peace due to intensified contact between nations. The development of
              broadcasttechnologyledmanytoexpectincreasedcitizenknowledgeand
                                             38
              the advancement of “high” culture. We now know that powered flight
              did indeed intensify the peaceful links between certain distant nations,
              just as it simultaneously extended the possibilities for war among others.
              Broadcast telecommunication can indeed serve to inform, to disseminate
              ideasandart,andonoccasiontoeducate,justasitalsoservesasamedium
              of entertainment, diversion, and reduction of culture to the simple and
              the lurid.
                 Like flight and broadcasting, information technology may have many
              effects at once. It may advance political equality in certain ways and
              undermine it in others, or enhance the power of states in some respects
              and diminish it in others. It may increase opportunities for superficial,
              thoughtless, democratically hollow speech as well as opportunities for
              meaningful deliberation and public speech. It is best to assume that
              information technology might both strengthen and weaken democracy,
              as well as exert little influence at all on some democratic processes.
                 In approaching the explanatory task this way, I do not invoke the stan-
              dard theories used by social scientists to explain the influence of technol-
              ogy on society, especially technological determinism and its theoretical
              opposite, social construction. The fundamental claim of technological
              determinism is twofold. First, the evolution of technology is not ran-
              dom or happenstance but follows an ordered sequence in the direction of
              greatercomplexity.Thisistosaythathumanagencyandinfluencearenot
              important to the direction of technological development: The Internet
              wasboundtobedevelopedbecauseofthelawsofnature,asweretheinter-
              nal combustion engine and the nuclear bomb, regardless of the economic
              or social circumstances that happened in practice to attend their emer-
              gence in history. Second, technological determinism holds that the tech-
              nologies present in the human environment at each particular historical
              moment “determine” the character of societies. That is, the nature of


              37  Sven Lindqvist, A History of Bombing (New York: New Press, 2001).
              38  Lawrence K. Grossman, The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Informa-
                tion Age (New York: Viking, 1995).



                                            30
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52