Page 49 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 49

P1: FpQ/IPH/GYQ
                                                       17:40
                                        August 14, 2002
                          CY101-Bimber
  CY101-01
            0 521 80067 6
                             Information and Political Change
              the modern theory of the social construction of technology. 41  In place
              of the concept of autonomous technology is now a set of claims that
              technologies embody and advance political interests and agendas – such
              as industrial efficiency – and are the product of social structure, culture,
              values, and politics as much as the result of objective scientific discovery.
                 Information technology is a ripe subject for analysis from this
              perspective, because of the collaboration of the U.S. government, private
              corporations, and universities that went into the development of the
              Internet. That is a story of Cold War military spending and strategy,
              the effect of institutions on policy, and how a public good once rejected
              by the market and subsidized by the government evolved into a mixed
              public-private good driven almost purely by private enterprise and
              increasingly contested between industries. Nonetheless, it will not be
              my purpose to explain the political origins of the Internet or other
              information technology, and for that topic I refer readers to other
              sources. 42  The Internet is indeed a “social construction,” but I do not
              explore that issue here.
                 Technology can be understood as political in the following ways with-
              out invoking either technological determinism or social construction-
              ism.Bydefinition,technologicaldevelopmentproducestoolsthatpermit
              novel forms of action, novel behaviors, and in some cases novel forms
              of value. When people engage in new acts with their new tools, their
              behavior sometimes falls outside the boundaries of extant rules and in-
              stitutions. Governing institutions are rarely able to anticipate new forms
              of action that will be made possible by technology, such as cloning of
              life forms, mass distribution of pornography, or the collection and sale
              of personal information about citizens by businesses. When such acts
              first emerge, they are often ungoverned or undergoverned by existing

              41  A good single-volume introduction and overview of this literature is Sheila Jasanoff
                et al., eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage
                Publications, 1995).
              42  For works presenting historical essays relevant to the history of the Internet, see:
                Thomas P. Hughes, Rescuing Prometheus (New York: Pantheon, 1998); Michael
                Margolis and David Resnick, Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution” (Thousand
                Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2000); Bruce L. R. Smith, American Science Policy since
                World War II (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1990); David C. Mowrey
                and Nathan Rosenberg, Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century
                America (Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1998); David M. Hart, Forged
                Consensus: Science, Technology and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921–1953
                (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998); Katie Hafner and Mathew Lyon, Where
                Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet (New York: Simon and Schuster,
                1996).


                                            32
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54