Page 74 - Information and American Democracy Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
P. 74

P1: IPI/IBE/IRR/GYQ
                                                         10:39
              0 521 80067 6
                                          August 13, 2002
                            CY101-Bimber
   CY101-02
                                The Rise of Majoritarianism
              These structural developments, which would have been impossible in
              1800, proceeded because of the new communication capacity and in
              turn deepened the dependence of the political system on the new com-
              munication. In other words, broad, citizen-level politics both depended
              on and fostered broad, citizen-level exchange of political information.
                The question of slavery was in many ways the first political proving
              ground for the new forms of collective action made possible by the infor-
              mationrevolutionofthe1820sand’30s.Thescoresofantislaverysocieties
              formed during and following this period depended on the new commu-
              nicationsystemtoreachmembersandsympathizers.Bythe1830s,citizen
              groups mobilized through mail and newspapers were flooding Congress
              with letters about slavery in what was arguably the first sustained
              “grassroots” policy campaign in the United States. 61  In 1835, a group
              called the American Anti-Slavery Society undertook a remarkably
              modern effort, acquiring the names of 20,000 prominent southerners
              and mailing them well over 100,000 abolitionist pamphlets. 62  At the
              same time, the American Temperance Society and other groups were
              experimenting with mass mail for distribution of antialcohol tracts and
              educational information. 63  The long-term success of the parties them-
              selves depended even more on the new communication capacity, both
              because citizens could themselves engage in issues of the day and because
              party elites could reach out to citizens in strategic ways.
                TheterrainofAmericanpoliticswasthereforefundamentallydifferent
              by midcentury than it had been at the start, for reasons that are rooted
              as much in communication as in processes that political scientists tradi-
              tionally label institution building. The newspapers were a key vehicle for
              generating and directing political interest in the newly active electorate.
              Party officials used the local papers to call meetings, to list delegates to
              conventions and caucuses, and to publicize the political rallies and events
              that eventually became such an important feature of nineteenth-century
              politics. At the same time, the papers also published notices of meetings
              and events involving the broader array of civic organizations, from re-
              ligious clubs to boards of directors of local banks and businesses. 64  The

              61  James L. Sundquist, Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of
                Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution,
                1983).
              62
                John, Spreading the News.
              63
                JackS.Blocker,Jr.,AmericanTemperanceMovements:CyclesofReform(Boston:Twayne
                Publishers, 1989).
              64
                Glenn C. Altschuler and Stuart M. Blumin, Rude Republic: Americans and Their Politics
                in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
                                            57
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79