Page 68 - Inorganic Mass Spectrometry : Fundamentals and Applications
P. 68

lead
           reason  to  believe  that  more  accurately  controlling  the  source  pressure  would
           to  improved  external precision, It is not  clear  why  the  discharge  pressure  influ-
           ences  the  measured  isotope   ratio;  one  possible  explanation   is  related  to  the
           changing  discharge  geometry  that  accompanies  the  pressure  change.
           extraction  efficiency  varies  as a function of  mass  and  distance  from the ion exit
           orifice, isotope bias may  be introduced  with  the changing  spatial  relationship
           between  the  sample  and   the extraction  optics.  This explanation  has  not  been
            verified,  however; the whole  phenomenon of  isotopic bias is difficult  to  access
            experimentally  in  nearly  all  fields of  mass  spectrometry.






            The rapid  development of commercial inst~mentation has  meant  that analyses
            that  were  previously  carried  out  only  by thermal  ionization  (often  with  isotope
                             done  with  inductively  coupled  plasma  mass  spectrometry
                             . The advantages  and  disadvantages of  each of  these  tech-
            niques  are  described  in  various  chapters  in  this  book.  One  limitation of thermal
            ioni~ation mass  spectrometry  (TIMS)  and  ICP-MS is the  need for digestion  prior
            to  analysis. Certain elements  in  difficult  matrices  (e.g.,  soils, sedimen~s, and
            vegetation)  often  pose  problems  because  of  their  low  solubilities  and  element-
            specific  chemistries.  In addition,  the  time-consuming  nature of dissolution  with its
            inherent  risks  of  conta~nation make  the  choice   of  performing  the  analysis
            directly  on  the  solid  attractive. Several investigations  have  focused  on  the  analysis
            of  uranium  in  soil  [ 103,1041.  To  demonstrate  the  power  of  the  technique  for
            analyzing other radionuclides, Betti et al. [ 1041 have  measured  cesium,  strontium,
            plutoniu~, uranium,  and  thorium  in soils, sediments,  and  vegetation,  Because all
            of these  materials  are  nonconducting,  they  had to be analyzed  with the surrogate
            cathode  approach.  Table  2.3 compares GDMS results  with  certified  values  for
            several  elements  in  several  different  standard  samples.  Errors  ranged



                             of
                    Co~pa~son Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry
            (G~~S) Results with  Certified  Values
                        GDMS value   Reference value (pg/g)
            Radioisotope   (pg/g)     (reference sarnple)   Errors %
            137Cs           5         3.86  (IAEA  373)  29.5
            239Pu  100                 92a  (IAEA  135)  8.7
            234U             1 .0      1.1  (IAEA  375)  9.0
            234U             1 .0      1.2  (IWA 135)  17.0
            235U  25                   22  (IAEA  4350)  13.6
            aValue given as 239Pu  + 24OPu.
            Source: Ref. 104.
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73