Page 114 - Inside the Film Factory New Approaches to Russian and Soviet Cinema
P. 114

INSIDE THE FILM FACTORY 95
            Exter’s theatre design from the start had aimed to give three-dimensional depth to
            the stage picture and to animate its immobile décor. Not only did Aelita continue this
            line of design experiment, but it made use of Kamerny actors, including Nikolai
            Tsereteli–the  Kamerny’s  Romeo–making his screen début as Los/Spiridonov.
            But, whereas  Romeo and  Juliet  was embellished with extraordinary ‘frozen
            dynamics’, echoing Boccioni’s sculpture, Aelita received a more austere treatment
            and moreover one precisely conceived for the medium of cinema. 56
              As in cinema history, canonic considerations in art history seem to have told
            against Exter. It would certainly be wrong to classify her and Rabinovich’s work as
            ‘Constructivist’ in the narrow sense defended by Christina Lodder, but equally the
            latter’s critique seems to be based on doubtful premisses:

              aesthetic factors dominate [Exter’s] creations for the School of Fashion…and
              her costume designs  for  the film  Aelita.  In both these branches of work
              considerations of strict utility played no role, and Exter’s use of geometrical
              forms as decorative elements stressed the essentially painterly nature of her
              approach to clothes. Aelita’s costume billowed out into extravagant vegetable
              protrusions more reminiscent of Art Nouveau than Constructivism, and her
              maid’s trousers, constructed of rectangular metallic strips, seemed designed
              to impede  rather than facilitate movement. It  is significant that  whereas
              Stepanova  and Popova used the theatre to realise  prozodezhda
              [‘production’ or work clothing] Exter produced these decorative fripperies. 57

            Another  historian of Russian and Soviet art, John Bowlt, makes  the  important
            observation that, while the Aelita costumes may look ‘unwieldy and rather absurd’
            on paper, ‘in the movie they function perfectly’. This is because they rely upon and
            actually exploit the changing viewpoint of cinema and its artificial ‘additive’ space. 58

              Knowing that in  the black and white  film, color in her designs would be
              superfluous, Exter restored to other systems of  formal definition.  This,
              together with her acute concern with space as a creative agent, prompted
              Exter to use a variety of unusual materials in the construction of the
              costumes and  to rely  on sharp contrasts  between  material textures–
              aluminium, perspex, metal-foil, glass. 59

            Many judgements  on  Aelita have been passed  without doubt  on the  basis  of
            drawings or  stills alone,  but viewing confirms how accurately the effects
            were calculated for this (literally) fantastic, yet flat and monochrome, world of Los’s
            dream–a very different challenge from the theatre projects tackled by other artists
            during the short-lived moment of Constructivism, but one approached according to
            the same analytic principles:

              both in Exter’s costumes and Rabinovich’s sets, industrial materials served a
              definite  objective: they  defined form in the  absence of color;  in  their
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119