Page 93 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 93

L1644_C02.fm  Page 68  Tuesday, October 21, 2003  3:07 PM
                      Emissions to  Electricity Electricity  Diff. c Sit. 2 b  (TJ) Sit. 1 a  (TJ)  Unit  water  –19% 4.27 × 10 1 3.59 × 10 1  kg Bauxite (ore)  –376% 1.01 × 10 3 2.12 × 10 2  kg  Clay  –110% 3.15 × 10 3 1.50 × 10 3  kg  Coal  –24%  3.36  2.71  kg Copper (ore)  –5% –1.38 × 10 4 –1.32 × 10 4  kg Iron (ore)  –35% 8.86 × 10 2 6.56 × 10 2  kg


                   Results of LCI Analysis from MSWI in Tarragona, Spain*
                        Diff. c  –19%  –8%  –38%  –34%  –100%  –19%  –28%  –46%  50%  100%  –42%  –26%  –59%  –59%


                      Electricity  Sit. 2 b  (TJ)  8.31 × 10 1  1.33 × 10 3  1.02 × 10 –3  9.93 × 10 –6  3.88 × 10 –3  6.54 × 10 –1  5.57 × 10 –1  4.49 × 10 –2  2.56 × 10 2  1.43 × 10 4  3.63 × 10 –5  8.39 × 10 –2  3.07 × 10 –6  1.89 × 10 –5




                      Electricity  Sit. 1 a  (TJ)   Unit  6.98 × 10 1  1.23 × 10 3  7.37 × 10 –4  7.39 × 10 –6  1.94 × 10 –3  5.51 × 10 –1  4.35 × 10 –1  3.07 × 10 –2  5.08 × 10 2  1.12 × 10 7  2.55 × 10 –5  6.68 × 10 –2  1.93 × 10 –6  1.19 × 10 –5 * All environmental loads referred to the functional unit, 1 TJ of electricity produced.





                TABLE 2.7 (continued)  Emissions to air  kg Non methane VOC  kg  NO x  kg  PAH  kg  Phenol  kg Phosphate  kg Pentane  kg Propane  kg Propene  kg  SO 2  ng TCDD-Equiv.  kg Tetrachloromethane  kg Toluene  kg Trichloromethane  kg Vinylchloride  a  Sit. 1 = Scenario 1.  b  Sit. 2 = Scenario 2. c  Diff. = (Scenario 1 – Scenario 2)/Scenario 1.
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98