Page 45 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 45

Introduction to Digital Oil and Gas Field Systems             25


              pattern of waterflooding process. In 12months, it was monetized for a
              total of 720 MSTB at $90 per barrel. More important, its intelligent sys-
              tem could predict with acceptable accuracy ESP wells with developing
              production problems. Jamal et al. (2013), Al-Enezi et al. (2013),and
              Al-Mutawa et al. (2013) reported that combining proactive and reactive
              actions—such as increase/decrease of ESP frequency and choke setting,
              cleaning wells, and shutting in temporary wells—KOC achieved an aver-
              age of 37% gain in oil production with just 10 actions per well. The total
              oil was almost 4 MSTB/d with a cumulative production of 756 MSTB in
              12months. Moreover, KOC reported in Al-Jasmi et al. (2013) that the
              time to analyze one well with production issues was reduced from
              7.3h to only 1.6h, thereby improving individual and team efficiency.
              No cost or financial information was reported; however, with these signi-
              ficant oil gains, we believe the operator should have an important reduc-
              tion in OPEX.


              1.6.3.4 Statoil’s Integrated Operations
              With its IO program, Statoil has realized that the real-time transfer of data
              over great distances can be used to eliminate the physical distance between
              installations at sea and support organizations onshore, between professional
              groups, and internally between the company and its suppliers. A report by
              Jones (2010) identifies these benefits of IO: improved HSE performance,
              more efficient drilling operations, better placement of wells, improved
              production optimization and oil recovery, better reservoir and production
              control and monitoring of equipment, more efficient maintenance, and
              increased regularity (production uptime). The benefits have been accounted
              with 3%–5% increased production, 20%–40% reduction in production
              losses, and 15%–30% reduction in operating and maintenance costs. In a
              2007 report, the Norwegian Oil Industry Association (2007) anticipated that
              the program might generate an incremental US$41 billion of net present
              value (NPV).



              1.6.3.5 I-Fields
              In its I-Field program, Chevron uses developments in sensors, monitoring,
              and optimization tools that anticipate and plan based on what is happening in
              real time and continually adjusts to operating conditions. Chevron estimates
              that its I-Field program has contributed to increases in output and reductions
              in operating costs by 2%–8% (Meyer, 2010).
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50