Page 157 -
P. 157

126   Chapter 4   Design for collaboration and communication


                          and so started announcing this to the passengers on the platform before controller
                          A  had even finished  talking with  the train driver. At other  times, the two con-
                          trollers keep a lookout for each other, monitoring the environment for actions and
                          events which they might have not noticed but may be important for them to know
                          about so that they can act appropriately.



                            hat do you think happens when one person of  a closely knit team does not see or hear
                             ething or misunderstands what has been said, while the others in the group assume they
                          have seen, heard, or understood what has been said?

            Comment       In such circumstances, the person is likely to carry on as normal. In some cases this will re-
                          sult in inappropriate behavior. Repair mechanisms will then need to be set in motion. The
                          knowledgeable participants may notice that the other person has not acted in the manner
                          expected. They may then use one of  a number of subtle repair mechanisms, say coughing
                          or glancing at something that needs attending to. If  this doesn't  work, they may then re-
                          sort to explicitly stating aloud what had previously been signaled implicitly.  Conversely,
                          the unaware participant may wonder why the event hasn't  happened and, likewise, look
                          over at the other people, cough to get their attention or explicitly  ask  them a question.
                          The kind of  repair mechanism employed at a given moment will depend on a number of
                          factors, including the relationship among the participants (e.g., whether one is more se-
                          nior than the others-this determines who can ask what), perceived fault or responsibility
                          for the breakdown  and the severity of  the outcome of  not acting there and then on the
                          new information.



            4.2.6  Designing collaborative technologies to  support awareness
                          The  various observations about  awareness have led system developers to con-
                          sider how best to provide awareness information for people who need to work to-
                          gether but who are not in the same physical space. Various technologies have
                          been employed along with the design of  specific applications to convey informa-
                          tion  about what  people  are doing and  the progress of  their  ongoing work.  As
                          mentioned previously, audio-video links have been developed to enable remote
                          colleagues to keep in touch with one another. Some of  these systems have also
                          been developed to provide awareness information about remote partners, allow-
                          ing them to find out what one another is doing. One of  the earliest systems was
                          Portholes, developed at Xerox PARC research labs (Dourish and Bly, 1992). The
                          system presented regularly-updated digitized video images of  people in their of-
                          fices from a number of different locations (in the US and UK). These were shown
                          in a matrix display on people's workstations. Clicking on one of  the images had
                          the effect of  bringing up a dialog box providing further information about that in-
                          dividual (e.g., name, phone number) together with a set of lightweight action but-
                          tons (e.g., email the person, listen to a pre-recorded audio snippet). The system
                          provided changing images of people throughout the day and night in their offices,
                          letting others see at a glance whether they were in their offices, what they were
                          working on, and  who was around (see Figure 4.10). Informal evaluation of  the
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162