Page 141 - INTRODUCTION TO THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
P. 141

128                                                   Minimal surfaces

                       As already seen in Chapter 3, even though the function f is strictly convex
                                    p
                       and f (ξ) ≥ |ξ| with p =1, we cannot use the direct methods of the calculus
                       of variations, since we are lead to work, because of the coercivity condition
                       f (ξ) ≥ |ξ|, inanonreflexive space W  1,1  (Ω). In fact, in general, there is no
                                                1,1
                       minimizer of (P) in u 0 + W 0  (Ω). We therefore need a different approach to
                       deal with this problem.
                          Before going further we write the associated Euler-Lagrange equation to (P)

                                          ⎡           ⎤          ⎡           ⎤
                                                           n
                                               ∇u         X   ∂       u x i
                                 (E)   div q          ⎦  =       ⎣ q         ⎦  =0
                                          ⎣
                                                     2       ∂x i           2
                                             1+ |∇u|      i=1       1+ |∇u|
                       or equivalently
                                                               n
                                              ³        ´      X
                                                      2
                                                                     u u
                                   (E) Mu ≡ 1+ |∇u|      ∆u −     u x i x j x i x j  =0 .
                                                              i,j=1
                       The last equation is known as the minimal surface equation.If n =2 and
                       u = u (x, y),itreads as
                                         ¡     2 ¢               ¡    2  ¢
                                   Mu = 1+ u   y  u xx − 2u x u y u xy + 1+ u x  u yy =0 .
                                          ¡ ¢
                          Therefore any C 2  Ω minimizer of (P) should satisfy the equation (E) and
                       conversely, since the integrand f is convex. Moreover, since f is strictly convex,
                       the minimizer, if it exists, is unique.
                          The equation (E) is equivalent (see Section 5.2) to the fact that the mean
                       curvature of Σ, denoted by H, vanishes everywhere.
                          It is clear that the above problem is, geometrically, too restrictive. Indeed
                       if any surface can be locally represented as a graph of a function (i.e., a non-
                       parametric surface), it is not the case globally. We are therefore lead to consider
                       more general ones known as the parametric surfaces.These are sets Σ ⊂ R n+1
                                                                                     n
                       so that there exist a domain (i.e. an open and connected set) Ω ⊂ R and a
                       map v : Ω → R n+1  such that
                                                  ¡ ¢   ©           ª
                                             Σ = v Ω = v (x): x ∈ Ω .
                                                                 3
                       For example, when n =2 and v = v (x, y) ∈ R , ifwedenoteby v x × v y the
                       normal to the surface (where a × b stands for the vectorial product of a, b ∈ R 3
                       and v x = ∂v/∂x, v y = ∂v/∂y)we find that the area is given by
                                                         ZZ
                                        Area (Σ)= J (v)=     |v x × v y | dxdy .
                                                            Ω
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146