Page 78 - INTRODUCTION TO THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
P. 78

Hamiltonian formulation                                            65

                   Step 4. We therefore have that the functions

                        (x, u, v) → ξ (x, u, v) ,f x (x, u, ξ (x, u, v)) ,f u (x, u, ξ (x, u, v))
                     1
                                                                          2
                are C . We then immediately obtain (2.7), (2.8), and thus H ∈ C . Indeed we
                have, differentiating (2.11),
                           ⎧
                           ⎪ H x = vξ − f x − f ξ ξ =(v − f ξ ) ξ − f x = −f x
                                                            x
                                                x
                                     x
                           ⎪
                           ⎪
                           ⎪
                           ⎨
                              H u = vξ − f u − f ξ ξ =(v − f ξ ) ξ − f u = −f u
                                                            u
                                                u
                                     u
                           ⎪
                           ⎪
                           ⎪
                           ⎪
                           ⎩
                                 H v = ξ + vξ − f ξ ξ =(v − f ξ ) ξ + ξ = ξ
                                           v      v           v
                and in particular
                                           ξ = H v (x, u, v) .
                This achieves the proof of the lemma.
                   The main theorem of the present section is:
                                                                            2
                Theorem 2.10 Let f and H be as in the above lemma. Let (u, v) ∈ C ([a, b])×
                 2
                C ([a, b]) satisfy for every x ∈ [a, b]
                                     ⎧
                                         u (x)= H v (x, u (x) ,v (x))
                                           0
                                     ⎨
                                 (H)
                                     ⎩   0
                                        v (x)= −H u (x, u (x) ,v (x)) .
                Then u verifies
                             d
                                           0
                                                              0
                      (E)      [f ξ (x, u (x) ,u (x))] = f u (x, u (x) ,u (x)) , ∀x ∈ [a, b] .
                            dx
                                 2
                Conversely if u ∈ C ([a, b]) satisfies (E) then (u, v) are solutions of (H) where
                                                   0
                                 v (x)= f ξ (x, u (x) ,u (x)) , ∀x ∈ [a, b] .
                Remark 2.11 The same remarks as in the lemma apply also to the theorem.
                   Proof. Part 1.Let (u, v) satisfy (H). Using (2.10) and (2.8) we get
                                                                 0
                                   u = H v (x, u, v) ⇔ v = f ξ (x, u, u )
                                    0
                                    v = −H u (x, u, v)= f u (x, u, u )
                                                               0
                                     0
                and thus u satisfies (E).
                   Part 2. Conversely by (2.10) and since v = f ξ (x, u, u ) we get the first
                                                                     0
                equation
                                           u = H v (x, u, v) .
                                            0
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83