Page 31 - Introduction to AI Robotics
P. 31

14
                                                                             1 From Teleoperation To Autonomy
                                                                                               AI Robotics
                                                         planetary rovers
                                                                   vision
                                      telemanipulators                                        telesystems


                                                      manufacturing                            Industrial
                                                                                              Manipulators

                                           1960        1970         1980        1990         2000

                                             Figure 1.1  A timeline showing forks in development of robots.



                                     placed on the mechanical aspects of the robot to ensure precision and re-
                                     peatability and methods to make sure the robot could move precisely and
                                     repeatable, quickly enough to make a profit. Because assembly lines were
                                     engineered to mass produce a certain product, the robot didn’t have to be
                                     able to notice any problems. The standards for mass production would make
                                     it more economical to devise mechanisms that would ensure parts would be
                                     in the correct place. A robot for automation could essentially be blind and
                                     senseless.
                                       Robotics for the space program took a different fork, concentrating instead
                                     on highly specialized, one-of-a-kind planetary rovers. Unlike a highly auto-
                                     mated manufacturing plant, a planetary rover operating on the dark side of
                                     the moon (no radio communication) might run into unexpected situations.
                                     Consider that on Apollo 17, astronaut and geologist Harrison Schmitt found
                                     an orange rock on the moon; an orange rock was totally unexpected. Ideally,
                                     a robot would be able to notice something unusual, stop what it was doing
                                     (as long as it didn’t endanger itself) and investigate. Since it couldn’t be pre-
                                     programmed to handle all possible contingencies, it had to be able to notice
                                     its environment and handle any problems that might occur. At a minimum,
                                     a planetary rover had to have some source of sensory inputs, some way of
                                     interpreting those inputs, and a way of modifying its actions to respond to
                                     a changing world. And the need to sense and adapt to a partially unknown
                                     environment is the need for intelligence.
                                       The fork toward AI robots has not reached a termination point of truly au-
                                     tonomous, intelligent robots. In fact, as will be seen in Ch. 2 and 4, it wasn’t
                                     until the late 1980’s that any visible progress toward that end was made. So
                                     what happened when someone had an application for a robot which needed
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36