Page 47 - Introduction to Information Optics
P. 47

32                    1. Entropy Information and Optics

       then one accepts a = 0 for the received event of b. But if

                                  p(b/ a = 0)
                                            < 1,                    (1.110)
                                  P(b/a = 1)

       then one accepts a = 1.
         From Eq. 1.106, we see that Eq. 1.109 implies that

                     P(a = 1)(C ]0 - C n ) = P(a = 0)(C 01 - C 00).

       Thus, ifC 1 0 — C 11 = C 01 — C 00, then the a priori probabilities of P(a) are
       equal. Note that applications of the likelihood ratio test are limited, since the
       decision making takes place without knowledge of the a priori probabilities.
       Thus, the results frequently are quite different from those from the minimum-
       error criterion.
         Although there are times when there is no satisfactory way to assign
       appropriate a priori probabilities and error costs, there is a way of establishing
       an optimum decision criterion; namely, the Neyman-Pearson criterion [1.9].
       One allows a fixed false-alarm probability and then makes the decision in such
       a way as to minimize the miss probability.



       1.5.3. SIGNAL RECOVERING
         An interesting problem in signal processing must be signal recovering (Le,,
       restoration). The type of optimum filters is the solution based on minimization
       of the mean-square error, as given by

                       2
                                                        2
                  min<e (f)> = min\ lim —      [L(t) -f d(tj]  dt ),  (1.111)
                                     D
                                  V^ °27'J_ 7 .
       where f 0(t) and f d(t) are the actual output and the desired output response of
       the filter. A linear filter that is synthesized by using minimum-mean-square
       error criterion is known as the optimum linear filter.
         Let us look at the mean-square-error performance of a linear filter function
       as given by


                                  T
                 ?(0 = lim ~ {  [ r HfrMt - r)dr -/,(*)T<*f,          (1.112)
                        '-« Ll J_ r LJ^, X J               J
       where h(t) is the impulse response of the filter and f^t) is the input signal
       function. By expanding the preceding equation, it can be shown that the
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52