Page 231 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 231

218  INTRODUCTION TO PALEOBIOLOGY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD


                      was a monument to our ignorance. Although         Acritarchs consist of vesicles composed of
                      many more taxa have been described since,       various polymers combined to form sporopol-
                      and their value in biostratigraphic correlation   lenin (Fig. 9.12). They range in shape from
                      has been proved, uncertainty still surrounds    spherical to cubic and in size from usually 50

                      the origin and affinities of the group. Similar-  to 100 μm, although some specimens from
                      ity, however, with the cyst stages of modern    the Triassic and Jurassic are as small as 15–
                      prasinophytes and  dinofl agellates suggests a   20 μm. Many lose these morphological details

                      relationship to primitive green algae. However,   when preserved as fl attened  films in black
                      because they are very useful in hydrocarbon     shales. There is a huge variety of basic shapes
                      exploration, perhaps the minor issue of their   (Fig. 9.13). Acritarchs can have single- or
                      identity can be left for future generations!    double-layered walls; the wall structure is
                                                                      often useful taxonomically. The central cavity
                      Morphology and classifi cation                   or chamber can be closed or open externally
                                                                      through a pore or slit called the pylome. The
                      The composition and broad morphology of         opening or epityche presumably allowed the
                      the acritarchs suggest similarities with the    escape of the motile stage and may be modi-
                      dinocysts; like the dinocysts, acritarchs are   fied with a hinged fl ap.

                      also often found in clusters. The group prob-     On the outside the acritarch may be smooth
                      ably had a similar life cycle to that of the    or, for example, have granulate or microgran-

                      dinoflagellates, single-celled protists that     ulate ornament. Moreover, the vesicle may be
                      mainly live in the marine plankton today.       modified by various extensions or processes

                      Acritarchs seem to show encystment struc-       projecting outwards from the vesicle wall. If
                      tures, or cysts – protective devices similar to   an acritarch has a set of similar processes,

                      those of modern dinoflagellates, in which the    they are termed  homomorphic, and if it
                      organism can survive drying out or lack of      has a variety of different projections it is
                      food for long periods. When conditions return   heteromorphic.
                      to normal, usually when the cyst is covered       Over 1000 genera of acritarchs are known,
                      with water again, the organism “escapes” by     defined mainly on shape characteristics (Box

                      bursting through the watertight skin of the     9.7). All acritarchs were aquatic with the vast
                      cyst, and resumes feeding and reproducing.      majority found in marine environments. The
                      A number of escape structures have been         classification of the group is based on the wall

                      described including median splits,  pylomes     structure, the shape of the body vesicle,
                      and cryptopylomes, that would have allowed      pylome type and the nature of the extensions
                      material to seep out.                           and processes.







                               Box 9.6  Ernst Haeckel, art and the radiolarians

                        The link between art and paleontology has always been strong, with many images fi nding  their
                        inspiration in the beauty of the fossil form. Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919), the German evolutionary
                        biologist, responsible for such terms as “Darwinism” and “ecology”, the phrase “ontogeny recapitu-
                        lates phylogeny” and the first detailed tree of life (see p. 128) was also an accomplished artist; he

                        believed in the esthetic dimension of morphology (Fig. 9.11). His giant opus Art Forms in Nature
                        (1899–1904) is considered to be one of the most elegant, artistic works of the 19th century, his
                        illustrations being a paleontological precursor to the Art Nouveau movement. His style is nowhere
                        better presented than in his monograph on the Radiolaria (Haeckel 1862). Unfortunately his attempts
                        to associate science with art may have damaged his career, but current interest in the tree of life has
                        generated a Haeckel renaissance. His illustrations are even available now as an attractive
                        screensaver!
                           You can see these beautiful images at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/paleobiology/.
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236