Page 257 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 257

244  INTRODUCTION TO PALEOBIOLOGY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD





                                 Box 10.3  The Ediacaran animals: a form classifi cation

                        RADIATA (RADIAL ANIMALS)

                        Three main classes are defined. Most colonial organisms in the fauna, for example Charnia, Char-

                        niodiscus and Rangea, are assigned to coelenterates and were part of the sessile benthos. The affi nities
                        of these animals have been debated in detail, but their close similarity to the sea-pens suggests an
                        assignment to the pennatulaceans.
                        Class CYCLOZOA

                        •  These animals have a concentric body plan with a large disk-shaped stomach and the class
                           includes mostly sessile forms such as Cyclomedusa and Ediacaria. About 15 species of jellyfi sh-
                           like animals have been described and in some, for example, Eoporpita tentacles are preserved
                        Class INORDOZOA
                        •  Medusa-like animals with more complex internal structures, for example Hielmalora
                        Class TRILOBOZOA

                        •  Characterized by a unique three-rayed pattern of symmetry. Tribrachidium and Albumares are
                           typical members of the group


                        BILATERIA (BILATERAL ANIMALS)
                        This division contains both smooth and segmented forms.
                        Smooth forms

                        •  These morphotypes are rare. They include Vladimissa and Platypholinia, which may be turbel-
                           larians, a type of platyhelminthes worm
                        Segmented forms

                        •  Much of the Ediacara fauna is dominated by segmented taxa inviting comparisons with the
                           annelids and arthropods. Dickinsonia, for example, may represent an early divergence from the
                           radial forms whereas Spriggina, although superficially similar to some annelids and arthropods,

                           possesses a unique morphology



                                                                      Mark McMenamin (1986), although this
                      Ecology
                                                                      model has its opponents. McMenamin con-
                      There is little doubt that the Ediacara biotas   sidered that the ecosystem was dominated by
                      dominated the latest Precambrian marine eco-    medusoid pelagic animals, and that attached,
                      system, occupying a range of ecological niches   sessile benthos and infaunal animals were
                      and pursuing varied life strategies probably    sparse; the medusoids have been reinterpreted
                      within the photic zone (Fig. 10.10). There is   as bacterial colonies or even holdfasts. Food
                      no evidence to suggest that any of the Edia-    chains were thus probably short and the
                      caran organisms were either infaunal or         trophic structure was apparently dominated
                      pelagic, thus in contrast to the subsequent     by suspension and deposit feeders.
                      Cambrian Period, life was restricted to the
                      seabed. It is also possible that these fl attened   Biogeography
                      organisms hosted photosymbiotic algae,
                      maintaining an autotrophic existence in the     Although provincialism was weak among the
                      tranquil “garden of Ediacara” as envisaged by   Ediacara biotas, three clusters have been rec-
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262