Page 258 - Introduction to Paleobiology and The Fossil Record
P. 258

ORIGIN OF THE METAZOANS  245














                      Ediacara
                                                                        Dickinsonia
                                                                                        Sprigginia
                                                 Rangea



                                   Charnia



                                                                       Tribrachidium       Praecambridium
                    Cyclomedusa              Medusinites
                (a)  Radiata                                          (b)  Bilateria
             Figure 10.8  Some typical Ediacara fossils: (a) the Radiata, which have been associated with the
             cnidarians, and (b) the Bilateria, which may be related to the annelids and arthropods. Ediacaria (×0.3),
             Charnia (×0.3), Rangea (×0.3), Cyclomedusa (×0.3), Medusinites (×0.3), Dickinsonia (×0.6), Spriggina
             (×1.25), Tribrachidium (×0.9) and Praecambridium (×0.6). (Redrawn from various sources by Anne
             Hastrup Ross.)



             ognized based on multivariate biogeographic     organisms. More importantly, the Ediacara
             analysis (see p. 45) by Ben Waggoner (2003):    body plan offered little defense against active
             (i) the Avalon assemblage is from deep-water,   predation. There is abundant evidence for
             volcaniclastic settings in eastern Newfound-    Cambrian predators: damaged prey, actual
             land; (ii) the White Sea assemblage represents   predatory organisms and the appearance of
             the classic Vendian section in the White Sea,   defense structures, such as trilobite spines and
             Russia; and (iii) the Nama assemblage is a      multielement skeletons. All suggest the exis-
             shallow-water association from Namibia,         tence of a predatory life strategy that was
             West Africa. Unfortunately the distribution of   probably established prior to the beginning of
             these assemblages does not match any paleo-     the Cambrian Period. The Proterozoic–
             geographic models for the period and the        Cambrian transition clearly marked one of
             clusters may rather represent a mixture of      the largest faunal turnovers in the geological

             environmental and temporal factors (Grazh-      record, with a significant move from soft-
             dankin 2004).                                   bodied, possibly photoautotrophic, animals
                                                             to heterotrophs relying on a variety of nutri-
             Extinction of the Ediacarans                    ent-gathering strategies. It is, however, still
                                                             uncertain whether a true extinction, or the
             The Ediacara biota, as a whole, became extinct   slamming shut of a taphonomic window,
             about 550 Ma. Nevertheless, in terms of lon-    accounted for the disappearance of the Edia-
             gevity, the ecosystem was very successful and   cara biota from the fossil record.
             a few seem to have survived into the Cam-
             brian. The rise of predators and scavengers     Cloudina assemblages
             together with an increase in atmospheric
             oxygen may have at last prevented the routine   Although the Ediacara biotas were overwhelm-
             preservation of soft parts and soft-bodied      ingly dominated by soft-bodied organisms,
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263