Page 163 - Introduction to chemical reaction engineering and kinetics
P. 163

6.5 Transition State Theory (TST)  145

                          transition state because the important Cl-C bond is stretched. The increased C-C-Cl bond
                          angle also increases  the  value of the smallest moment of inertia. Thus, the ratio Q&,/Q,,,
                          is greater than 1. An exact calculation requires a quantitative estimate of the bond lengths
                          and angles. The transition state has the same number of vibrational modes, but several
                          of the vibrational frequencies in the transition state are expected to be somewhat lower,
                          particularly those involving both the weakened C-Cl bond stretch and the affected C-H
                          bond. It is also possible to form the transition state with any of the three hydrogen atoms
                          on the  CH,  group, and so a symmetry number of 3 accrues to the transition state. The
                          internal rotation around the C-C bond is inhibited in the transition state, which decreases
                          the contribution of this model to  Qz  , but the rest of the considerations increase it, and the
                          net effect is that (es/Q,)   >  1. From the value of the  A  factor in Example 6-4, Al(kTlh)  =
                          (Q$/Q,)  = 38.4. As  with  many theories, the information flows two ways: (1) measured
                          rate constants can be used to study the properties of transition states, and (2) information
                          about transition states gained in such studies, as well as in calculations, can be used to
                          estimate rate constants.




                          Consider a bimolecular reaction, A + B  -+ products. Confining two molecules A and B
                          to be together in the transition state in a bimolecular reaction always produces a loss of
                          entropy. This is dominated by the ratio of the translational partition functions:

                           <Q~~lV>l<Q,,lV>(Q,,,lV>  = W-m A+B  kgTlh2)3’2/[2~mAkgTlh2)3’2(2n-mg   kBTlh2)3’2]
                                                 = (2r,u kBTlh2)-3i2
                          where  p  is the reduced mass, equation 6.4-6. This ratio introduces the volume units to the
                          rate constant, and is always less than 1 for a bimolecular (and termolecular) reaction. At
                          500 K, and for a reduced mass of 30 g  mol-l,  this factor is 1.7 X  1O-6  L mol-’  s-l,  and
                          corresponds to an entropy change of  -  110 J  mol-’  K-l.  The number of internal modes
                          (rotation and vibration) is increased by 3, which partly compensates for this loss of entropy.
                            If A and B are atoms, the two rotational modes in the transition state add 70 J  mol-’
                          K-’ to the entropy of the transition state. The total AS”*  is therefore approximately -40
                          J  mol-’  K-l,  a value in agreement with the typical value given in Table 6.1. For each of
                          the two rotational modes, the moment of inertia cited in Table 6.2 is  I  =  pdi,;   the value
                          above is calculated using dAB  = 3 X lo-lo m.

     6.54   Comparison of TST with SCT

                          Qualitatively, both the TST and the SCT are in accord with observed features of kinet-
                          ics:

                            (1) Both theories yield laws for elementary reactions in which order, molecularity,
                                and stoichiometry are the same (Section 6.1.2).
                            (2) The temperature dependence of the reaction rate constant closely (but not
                                exactly) obeys the Arrhenius equation. Both theories, however, predict non-
                                Arrhenius behavior. The deviation from Arrhenius behavior can usually be
                                ignored over a small temperature range. However, non-Arrhenius behavior is
                                common (Steinfeld et al., 1989, p. 321). As a consequence, rate constants are
                                often fitted to the more general expression k = BPexp( -EIRT),  where  B , IZ,
                                and E are empirical constants.
                            The activation energy in both theories arises from the energy barrier at the transition
                          state, and is treated similarly in both. The relationship between the pre-exponential fac-
                          tors in the two theories is not immediately obvious, since many of the terms which arise
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168