Page 251 - Introduction to chemical reaction engineering and kinetics
P. 251

9.1 Gas-Solid (Reactant) Systems 233

                             We can eliminate  Y, from this equation in favor of fn,  from a relation based on the
                           shrinking volume of a sphere:



                                                                                            (9.1-27)



                           to obtain


                                                                            1  [
                                                    1  -  3(1  -  Q’s  + 2(1  -  fn)  + +&  1 - (1 - Q’s


                                                                                            (9.1-28)


                             If we denote the time required for complete conversion of the particle  (fn  = 1) by  tl,
                           then, from equation 9.1-28,



                                                                                            (9.1-29)




                           t,  is a kinetics parameter, characteristic of the reaction, embodying the three parameters
                           characteristic of the individual rate processes,  kAg,   D,,  and  kkc,   and particle size,  R.

                             Equations 9.1-28 and -29 both give rise to special cases in which either one term (i.e.,
                           one rate process) dominates or two terms dominate. For example, if D, is small com-
                           pared with either kAg  or kAs, this means that ash-layer diffusion is the rate-determining
                           or controlling step. The value of t or ti is then determined entirely by the second term
                           in each equation. Furthermore, since each term in each equation refers only to one rate
                           process, we may write, for the overall case, the additive relation:



                                   t  = t(film-mass-transfer  control)  +  t(ash-layer-diffusion  control)  (9.1-30)
                                                                    1
                                       + t(surface-reaction-rate control)




                           and similarly for tl  .






                           For the situation in Example 9-1, derive the result for  t(fE)  for reaction-rate control,’ that
                           is, for the surface reaction as the rate-determining step (rds), and confirm that it is the


                           ‘As noted by Froment and Bischoff (1990, p.  209),  the case of surface-reaction-rate control is not consistent
                           with the existence of a sharp core boundary in the SCM, since this case implies that diffusional  transport could
                           be slow with respect to the reaction rate.
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256