Page 148 -
P. 148

Knowledge Capture and Codifi cation                                    131



                 Facet 1:  Audience        Facet 2:  Topic

                 Researcher                Social cognition, emotional IQ
                 Technology transfer officer  Online hate content detection
                 Media liason officer       Bullying, cyberbullying
                 Donor relations officer    Adolescent issues, peer pressure


                 Adolescent issues         Hate literature
                   Peer Pressure              Online hate literature
                      Bullying                  Online detection/monitoring
                        Cyberbullying             Cyberbullying
                 Figure 4.9
                 Example of multifaceted taxonomy for cyberbullying

                    Information professionals are the ideal candidates to carry out knowledge creation,
               capture, codifi cation, and organization. Information professionals have a solid founda-
               tion in library and information science skills and are already very adept at such skills
               as structured interviewing (as they conduct reference interviews) and the development
               of classifi cation frameworks. The process of analyzing and reworking the tacit and
               explicit information will help clarify what the organization knows and what it needs
               to know. It is neither necessarily cheap nor easy, but it will capture key knowledge
               and improve consistency and generalizability throughout the organization. Writing
               good content is the best way of creating knowledge assets within an organization. An
               example showing two facets of good knowledge creation is shown in   fi gure 4.9 .


                 The Relationships among Knowledge Management, Competitive Intelligence,
               Business Intelligence, and Strategic Intelligence
                 Knowledge management has historically focused on capturing knowledge from within
               the organization and from past events in the history of the organization while com-
               petitive intelligence has traditional focused on external resources ( Bouthillier and
               Dalkir 2005 ). Competitive intelligence (CI) can be defi ned as  “ A systematic and ethical
               program for gathering, analyzing, and managing external information that can affect
               your company ’ s plans, decisions, and operations. ”  (SCIP, Society of Competitive Infor-
               mation Professionals, http://www.scip.org/) However, both KM and CI are concerned
               with  “ strategic intelligence, ”  that is, information resources that are needed for decision
               making, which in turn benefi ts, the company ( Liebowitz 2006 ). Business intelligence
               (BI) is often used as a synonym for CI, but really refers to the set of tools that allow
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153