Page 151 -
P. 151

134                                                              Chapter 4



                   •     Protect people ’ s privacy.
                   •     Create a bridge to organizational memory for long-term retention of the valuable
               content.

                 Practical Implications of Knowledge Capture and Codifi cation


                 While the benefi ts of capturing tacit knowledge and codifying explicit knowledge are
               obvious to organizations, they can be fairly vague at the level of the individual knowl-
               edge worker. The prevalence of the  “ knowledge is power ”  paradigm makes it diffi cult
               to  “ sell ”  employees on the importance of having their knowledge retained by the
               organization as a future hedge for when they are no longer working there. Knowledge
               is a curious asset — one that cannot be owned but merely borrowed or rented. Some
               knowledge remains within the organization when employees leave but this needs to
               be the  “ right ”  kind of knowledge and workers will need to be able to access and make
               use of it.
                    A number of recommendations include:
                   Acknowledge knowledge contributors    Turning tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge
               is diffi cult for many users and often faces resistance, despite the obvious benefi ts.
               Acknowledge workers who not only create original content, but also help improve the
               content over time by adding additional context from customer interactions. KM soft-
               ware should offer reports to identify those who are contributing, or help to tap the
               tacit knowledge by building profi les of experts based on their contributions.
                   Remember to forget    The role of unlearning or reframing cannot be emphasized enough
               (e.g.,  Fiol and Lyles 1985 ). The organizational knowledge base should not be viewed
               as unlimited storage space to be fi lled. While there may not be any technological
               constraints, there are certainly conceptual constraints to take into consideration.
               Unlearning involves disposing of old frameworks and breaking away from the status
               quo — a form of double loop learning.  Van de Ven and Polley (1992)  suggest that the
               type of unlearning that involves responses to mistakes and failures can play an impor-
               tant role in knowledge acquisition and deployment — if they are viewed as learning
               opportunities. As Edison put it:  “ I have not failed. I ’ ve just found 10,000 ways that
               won ’ t work ”  (Thomas A. Edison, as quoted in  The World Book Encyclopedia  (1993) Vol.
               E, p. 78).
                   Do not spill any knowledge during transfer    Conversion of tacit knowledge to explicit
               knowledge must be accomplished without signifi cant loss of knowledge (e.g.,  Brown
               and Duguid 2000 ). The advantages of communicability do not always outweigh the
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156