Page 161 -
P. 161

144                                                              Chapter 5



                   Table 5.1
                 Results of the IBM Institute survey

                                           Number of respondents        Percent of respondents
                 Information source      who chose this source        who chose this source

                   People                  34                         85
                   Prior material          16                         40
                   Web                     10                         25
                   Knowledge base           4                         12
                   Other                    4                         12


               knowledge base was ranked only fourth among the fi ve choices for preferred sources
               of information as shown in   table 5.1 .
                      Cross and Parker (2004)  found that people are the most critical conduits of infor-
               mation and knowledge. Knowledge workers typically spend a third of their time
               looking for information and helping their colleagues do the same. A knowledge worker
               is fi ve times more likely to turn to another person rather than an impersonal source
               such as a database or KM systems. Only one in fi ve knowledge workers consistently
               fi nds the information needed to do his or her job, and  Cross and Parker (2004)  found
               that knowledge workers spend more time recreating existing information they were
               unaware of than creating original material.
                    A similar type of study was undertaken with a large aviation company in the United
               States. This was a longitudinal study that took place over seven years and studied the
               ways in which individuals in this large organization sought out and found informa-
               tion. The research team actually sat down with and observed highly skilled profes-
               sionals as they went about their daily work. Not only did these workers prefer to
               contact other people in order to fi nd, retrieve, and make use of information, but this
               also turned out to be a more successful strategy to use.
                    It turns out that, not only are other people the preferred source of information,
               but that there are a number of reasons for this. One is of course that it is often faster,
               but this is not the only reason. When we turn to another person, we not only end up
               with the information we were looking for, but we also help learn where it was found.
               In addition, the person turned to may help us to reformulate our question or query,
               tell us whether we were on the right track or where we strayed, and, last but not least,
               that the information is coming to us from a known and usually trusted, credible
               source. In other words, people are the best means of getting not only a direct answer
               but also  “ metaknowledge ”  about our search target and our search capabilities. Talking
               to other people provides a highly valuable learning activity that is primarily a tacit-
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166