Page 175 -
P. 175

158                                                              Chapter 5



                 Types of Communities
                 All communities share some basic characteristics, regardless of the type of community.
                 Wenger (1998)  identifi es these as joint enterprise (a common goal), mutual engage-
               ment (commitment by all members), and shared repertoire (typically a virtual work-
               space for all members to be able to interact with one another) see (  fi gure 5.6 ).
                    Joint enterprise refers to the glue that binds members together — why they want to
               interact with one another. Reasons for interacting with one another will typically be
               a personal goal and contribution toward the community ’ s goal. Mutual engagement
               refers to how members become part of the community. They do not automatically
               belong because they say so, because they have a certain job title, or because they know
               someone. There are membership rules and each member agrees to carry out certain
               roles and responsibilities in order to help achieve the goals of the CoP. Finally, a shared
               repertoire refers to the shared workspace where members can communicate, where
               they can store and share knowledge products, their profi les, and so on. The shared
               repertoire is typically space on a server — it may be an intranet within an organization





                                   Typically the improvement
                                    of members’ profession



                                        Common goal







                         Commitment                 Virtual workspace



                   Participation fueled by           A place to store stories,
                  trust, interest, credibility,         artifacts, tools,
                    professionalism and              discussions, glossaries,
                     ethical behaviors                  historical events


                 Figure 5.6
                 Common characteristics of CoPs (adapted from  Wenger 1998 )
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180